Why NASA Failed to Find Martian Fossils
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Wretch Fossil
Nov 3, 2012, 11:57:24 PM11/3/12
to Paleontology and Fossil Talk
The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
minerals. Examples:
1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
cracks, fracture fills.
3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
Micrographic evidence for above claims:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
Detailed descriptions for above claims:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_15.html
minerals. Examples:
1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
cracks, fracture fills.
3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
Micrographic evidence for above claims:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
Detailed descriptions for above claims:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_15.html
Wretch Fossil
Nov 4, 2012, 2:03:56 AM11/4/12
to Paleontology and Fossil Talk
New edition:
The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
minerals . Examples:
1. Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
2. Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock, or
fracture fills.
3. Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4. Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
Micrographic evidence for above claims:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
Detailed descriptions for above claims:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_15.html
NASA recently detected feldspar, pyroxene and olivines on Mars :
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
Could the minerals be fossils? I mean NASA's interpretation of above
graph could be wrong, as mineral identification is sometimes not as
clear cut as one thinks it is.
On Nov 4, 11:57 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
> minerals. Examples:
> 1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
> 2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
> cracks, fracture fills.
> 3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
> 4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
> plagioclase.
>
> NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
> Micrographic evidence for above claims:http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
>
> Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
minerals . Examples:
2. Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock, or
fracture fills.
3. Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4. Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
Micrographic evidence for above claims:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
Detailed descriptions for above claims:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_15.html
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
Could the minerals be fossils? I mean NASA's interpretation of above
graph could be wrong, as mineral identification is sometimes not as
clear cut as one thinks it is.
On Nov 4, 11:57 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
> minerals. Examples:
> 1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
> 2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
> cracks, fracture fills.
> 3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
> 4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
> plagioclase.
>
> NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
>
> Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
Wretch Fossil
Nov 4, 2012, 4:28:26 AM11/4/12
to Paleontology and Fossil Talk
On Nov 4, 3:03 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> New edition:
>
> The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
> minerals . Examples:
> 1. Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
> 2. Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock, or
> fracture fills.
> 3. Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
> 4. Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
> plagioclase.
>
> Micrographic evidence for above claims:http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
>
> Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
>
> NASA recently detected feldspar, pyroxene and olivines on Mars :http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
> Could the minerals be fossils? I mean NASA's interpretation of above
> graph could be wrong, as mineral identification is sometimes not as
> clear cut as one thinks it is.
>
> On Nov 4, 11:57 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
> > minerals. Examples:
> > 1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
> > 2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
> > cracks, fracture fills.
> > 3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
> > 4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
> > plagioclase.
>
> > NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
> > Micrographic evidence for above claims:http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29http://www.w...
>
> Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
>
> NASA recently detected feldspar, pyroxene and olivines on Mars :http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
> Could the minerals be fossils? I mean NASA's interpretation of above
> graph could be wrong, as mineral identification is sometimes not as
> clear cut as one thinks it is.
>
> On Nov 4, 11:57 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
> > minerals. Examples:
> > 1.Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
> > 2.Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock,
> > cracks, fracture fills.
> > 3.Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
> > 4.Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
> > plagioclase.
>
> > NASA’s press release shows above-mentioned Martian “minerals”:http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4835
>
>
> > Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
> > Detailed descriptions for above claims:http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_1...
New edition:
The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
minerals.
Examples:
1. Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
2. Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock, or
fracture fills.
3. Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4. Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
Minerals and non-life material have no DNA to grow into the shapes and
The reason is simple: geologists mistook fossilized cells/tissues for
minerals.
Examples:
1. Red blood cell remains were identified as geologic vesicles.
2. Blood vessel remains were identified as olivines, veins of rock, or
fracture fills.
3. Neuron remains were identified as pyroxenes.
4. Skeletal muscle cell remains were identified as feldspar
plagioclase.
sizes marked in these photos:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=30
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=29
http://www.wretch.cc/album/album.php?id=lin440315&book=20
Details for specific fossils:
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.tw/p/major-messages-from-wretch-fossil_15.html
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages