I am new to both Ruby and Pakyow but seem to be having trouble...

[larry mason]

I installed Ruby 1.9.3 (I have a 64 bit Windows Server7) and updated RubyGems to 2.2.2 then ran  >pakyow new warmup... it created a new dir and looks good (no errors reported). 

D:\>pakyow new warmup

Generating project: warmup

Running `bundle install`

Done!

however when I change to the warmup dir and run pakyow server I get the message:

D:\warmup>pakyow server

←[31mCould not find gem 'puma (>= 0) x86-mingw32' in the gems available on this

machine.←[0m

←[33mRun `bundle install` to install missing gems.←[0m

Any hints as to where I should start to look?

Cheers, Larry

[Wayne Schroer]

Hey Larry,

When you are in the warmup directory try running 'bundle install' again and see what you get for output.  If that doesn't work, try installing it manually with "gem install puma' .  

If you can't get puma to install on your system you could install another server like thin and try that.  Just replace puma in the Gemfile with 'thin' and 'bundle install' again.

~Wayne 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pakyow" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pakyow+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Wayne Schroer]

Larry,

Another thing to try is make sure you execute pakyow server using the bundle.  So instead of just pakyow server, do 'bundle exec pakyow server'

[larry mason]

Well I didn't see you second post 'til just now... but it seems that puma didn't install because I needed the devkit... so going back to RubyInstall and got the devkit... init'd and installed that but still couldn't install puma... (this time is said Failed to build gem native extension.) so I tried your second option using this server and after a couple of refresh or cache problems I guess (deleted the project reinstalled, changed the Gemfile again) it ran. So now the question is should I go back and try to make it run with puma, or is "thin"  just as good? Thanks Larry 

[Bryan Powell]

Puma / Windows don't get along. Just use Thin.

Bryan P.

[larry mason]

OK Thanks guys... cheers, Larry