PageSpeed score get better at any try

[mattiello marco]

Hello,

Is happening something strange 

the first time I test my website http://marcomattiello.com/ the result is a Poor score

Second time gets a bit better, and so on until it stays at a fix 95/100.....

I can't understand how really score my page 

Any Idea?

[Milton Akira Fukuhara]

i have the same issue, did you find some solution? 

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

Really, really - but its very hard way )))

понедельник, 28 августа 2017 г., 13:42:46 UTC+3 пользователь mattiello marco написал:

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

1. First download images from recomendation links of google 

https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/optimizeContents?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarcomattiello.com%2F&strategy=mobile

1.1. See if acceptable image you quality and replace for hosting

2. Using Google Tag Manager

include in GTM you code analytics and secondary google code

May bee need more changes with GMT 

After - you can see only one point 

Сократите время ответа сервера

По результатам тестирования время ответа вашего сервера составило 21,8 секунды.

Really you server is very slowly, but need doing first two points.

If have any question you can write me on skype:  anatoliydovgun or Viber/Telegram/WhatsUp +380990293439

I can help you, but i must see code site.

понедельник, 28 августа 2017 г., 13:42:46 UTC+3 пользователь mattiello marco написал:

Hello,

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

Welcome to the Winners Club of Google PagetSpeed Insight

Morning seo works!

#seofriendly #seointhemorning #morningseo #pagespeed #seo

понедельник, 28 августа 2017 г., 13:42:46 UTC+3 пользователь mattiello marco написал:

Hello,

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

Welcome to the Winners Club of Google PagetSpeed Insight

Morning seo works!

#seofriendly #seointhemorning #morningseo #pagespeed #seo

понедельник, 28 августа 2017 г., 13:42:46 UTC+3 пользователь mattiello marco написал:

Hello,

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

Вот откровенно не могу понять.

Человек спросил, эму ответили помогли и частично решили проблему.

А в ответ ноль реакции. Откровенно после такого даже вступать в обсуждение не охота.

Я раньше думал что это у нас так принято, а оказывается у нас все замечательно, это у них так убого, и поэтому только все за деньги! 

А где же спортивный интерес? Драйв, желание помочь, решить, отблагодарить.

понедельник, 28 августа 2017 г., 13:42:46 UTC+3 пользователь mattiello marco написал:

Hello,

[Rick Steinwand]

Mattiello,

I checked out your page and WebPageTest said it took 10 seconds to see content and 12 seconds to fully loaded. (What?) Ideally you want the entire page loaded in 2-3 seconds with visible content well under one second.

Waterfall didn't look too bad and scripts appeared to be loading late, which is what you want. A few images weren't optimal, but easily fixed.

Then I viewed your page source. You have what seemed to be gb's of inlined css and lots of fonts being loaded. Inlined css is not cacheable and has to be loaded on every page. Assuming you don't have a MySql database that needs to be accessed for every hit, your huge page size is probably part of your time-to-first bye problem. https://www.webpagetest.org/result/170908_V7_a8baa361090b66c428608c4815a45dfe/

I'd recommend you: 

• Ditch the page loader. People want to read the page while it loads, not stare at something spinning while it loads.
  
• Move your css common to every page to an external file and inline only what's needed for that page. After first page load, that css will already be cached for other pages. (Better yet, inline critical css and post-load the rest after the page loads, but that's for later.)
• Disable the fonts for now.
• How many images, etc are you inlining in that css? Ideally you want a css file that's about 1k or smaller so the entire file can be loaded in one request.

Now retest and see if time-to-first byte is better.

Assuming your images are properly sized, I've had good luck saving jpgs as progressive-encoded and upload them (and any pngs) to https://tinypng.com

See if that helps.

[Anatoliy Dovgun]

I check page and have - http://joxi.ru/v29PoN5F3lB1Nm

Good

95 / 100

Good

95 / 100

ANd ?

пятница, 8 сентября 2017 г., 20:48:12 UTC+3 пользователь Rick Steinwand написал:

[mattiello marco]

Hello , Sorry for the delay was a really busy time 

I partially solve the problem by myself,

Iàm using WordPress, I canàt give ONE solution because I did a lot of things, but I will List it

- I Used the free CDN Account of CloudFlare 

- I install EWWW image optimizer

- I took off any CSS animation 

After doing that the things improved a lot....

Hope that can help

[mattiello marco]

Hello Mate,

Thanks For your answer, I actually solved the problem by myself the same day that I post this question

I couldn't,t answer anymore because really busy in some projects,

But I want to Thank you anyway, you were really kind to answer and I hope it will help other people that have the same problem!