Romney Record on Environment
Hydr...@aol.com
For Immediate Release: Thursday, June
14, 2012
Contact: Kyla Bennett (508) 230-9933; Kirsten Stade (202)
265-7337
ROMNEY NOT LIKELY TO BE A CONSERVATION PRESIDENT
Dismal Land Preservation Record in Massachusetts Bodes Ill for Natural
Legacy
Boston — Under Governor Mitt Romney, land
preservation efforts in Massachusetts took a nose dive, according to Public
Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). During Romney’s tenure,
sprawl accelerated, less land was protected and the Commonwealth disinvested in
preservation.
Shortly after taking office, Gov. Romney created the Office
of Commonwealth Development (OCD). The shift of policy embodied by OCD was
moving away from permanently protecting land and instead encouraging new
projects in already developed areas. The problem with this approach was that
unprotected land still gets developed. As a result –
- By Romney’s last year in office,
Massachusetts was protecting fewer acres than under his predecessors.
Acreage protected fell from more than 33,000 acres protected in 2001 to less
than 6,900 acres in 2006 – a lower total than any year since
1991.
- On average, 40 acres of undeveloped land
were lost per day in the Commonwealth as the level of state investment in open
space preservation and the amount of land protected both dropped;
and
- By shrinking the role of state environmental agencies in selecting lands for protection, some of the most environmentally sensitive lands were targeted for development while more marginal tracts are left as open space.
“What occurred under Romney was the
opposite of smart growth,” stated New England PEER Director Kyla Bennett, a
former lawyer and biologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
“Romney’s central failing was substituting rhetoric for real investment and, as
a consequence, our Commonwealth’s future generations are the poorer for
it.”
Ironically, even as the amount of protected
acreage went down the cost per acre went up. The cost of preserving one
acre rose from $3,400 in 2000 to more than $5,000 per acre in
2006.
Besides open space policies, Romney public
work projects developed natural places. Perhaps the most notorious example
was his decision to drain Blue Hills Reservoir, the heart of a natural park
protected since 1893. It was the largest net loss of wetlands in
Massachusetts since 1990. After an administrative law judge ruled that
filling the reservoir without adequate mitigation violated state law, Romney
appointees overrode that decision.
After the reservoir was drained, the
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority buried huge concrete tanks filled with
20 million gallons of water to serve as a one-day emergency drinking water
reserve for 100,000 customers, mostly in Quincy. The site was then covered with
dirt and sod.
“What happened at Blue Hills epitomized the
stunted environmental priorities of the Romney administration,” added Bennett.
“This same approach on a national level could put our conservation heritage at
risk.”
###
Look
at Massachusetts land use policies under Romney
See
prime example of Romney land use philosophy