Re: Demystifying language of Gods - New Indian Express
18 views
Skip to first unread message
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
May 27, 2014, 12:29:23 AM5/27/14
to Vasuvaj, padyadhaaraa पद्यधारा, Suhas Mahesh
+ पद्यधारा, सुहाशश्च
अधस्तन-वार्तायाः पठनेन तुष्येऽहम्( http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bangalore/Demystifying-Language-of-Gods/2014/05/26/article2245034.ece1 ) ।
"Suhas Mahesh, an undergraduate at IISc, happens to be a regular volunteer. As a hobby, he composes verses on all that he loves, from noodles and the divine taste of litchi ice cream to the recent elections. ... Online forums like Padyapaana are also popularising the reading and composition of classical poetry, and its members write on all topics, ancient or modern, with skill and mastery."
अधस्तन-वार्तायाः पठनेन तुष्येऽहम्( http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/bangalore/Demystifying-Language-of-Gods/2014/05/26/article2245034.ece1 ) ।
"Suhas Mahesh, an undergraduate at IISc, happens to be a regular volunteer. As a hobby, he composes verses on all that he loves, from noodles and the divine taste of litchi ice cream to the recent elections. ... Online forums like Padyapaana are also popularising the reading and composition of classical poetry, and its members write on all topics, ancient or modern, with skill and mastery."
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Vasuvaj <vas...@hotmail.com> wrote:
cityexp...@newindianexpress.comNamastePlease read an interesting news about Samskrita Bharati at the following site:
http://epaper.newindianexpress.com/278293/The-New-Indian-Express-Bangalore/26-MAY-2014#page/17/2
OR just google:
Demystifying language of Gods - New Indian ExpressAfter reading , please post your comment on the bottom of the essay or send a complimentary note to the following e-mail id:
The folks in New Indian Express should receive thousands of complimentary mails.
If possible, please send the mail from your office e-mail id with your qualification and designation.
.Let them know that the writer of the mail is not some silly illiterate Abdulla or Joseph but a highly qualified and respectable person like you.Let them know that there is a large community of readers who love, appreciate and have high regard for Samskritam.
This might motivate them to publish more Samskrit related news in the future.Bhavadiiyah,Vasuvaj
--
--
Vishvas /विश्वासः
Phillip Ernest
May 27, 2014, 7:24:39 AM5/27/14
to padyad...@googlegroups.com, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
2014-05-27 9:59 GMT+05:30, विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
<vishvas...@gmail.com>:
>> Let them know that the writer of the mail is not some silly illiterate
>> Abdulla or Joseph but a highly qualified and respectable person like you.
इति गणना लघुचेतसाम् ।
<vishvas...@gmail.com>:
>> Let them know that the writer of the mail is not some silly illiterate
>> Abdulla or Joseph but a highly qualified and respectable person like you.
H Krishnapriyan
May 27, 2014, 8:50:51 AM5/27/14
to padyad...@googlegroups.com, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
I agree. People with names like Abdullah or Joseph are not necessarily silly and illiterate and people with names like Krishna need not be highly qualified and respectable.
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
May 27, 2014, 10:07:31 AM5/27/14
to Natesa Janakiraman, padyadhaaraa पद्यधारा, Suhas Mahesh
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Natesa Janakiraman <natesa.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
"तुष्टोऽहम्", "सन्तुष्टोऽहम्" वा खलु॥कदाचित् छन्दसि आत्मनेपदी प्रयोग: "तुष्ये" अनुमतमिति चिन्तये। गद्ये सर्वदा "तुष्यामि" (चतुर्थः गणः) इत्येव वक्तव्यमिति भाति॥
(+ अन्ये) साध्विदमुक्तम्।
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
May 27, 2014, 10:10:51 AM5/27/14
to padyadhaaraa पद्यधारा, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom,_Dick_and_Harry ← अस्मिन्नर्थे अब्दुल्ल-जोसेफौ प्रयुक्तौ। अन्यथा मन्यमानैः प्रायो दोषः कृतः।
तथा च फ़िलिप्पासदृशस्य समाजस्य दृष्टिकोणेन अक्षरस्था विद्यावन्तश् च गौरवयुक्ततरा इति स्थितिः।
तथा च फ़िलिप्पासदृशस्य समाजस्य दृष्टिकोणेन अक्षरस्था विद्यावन्तश् च गौरवयुक्ततरा इति स्थितिः।
Phillip Ernest
May 27, 2014, 9:40:33 PM5/27/14
to padyad...@googlegroups.com, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
यदि इदम् विवक्षितम् स्यात् तदा देवदत्तः अपि अत्र स्यात् । न तु अस्ति ।
सत्यम् विवक्षितम् जानीमः । त्वम् अपि जानासि ।
सत्यम् विवक्षितम् जानीमः । त्वम् अपि जानासि ।
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
May 27, 2014, 10:28:14 PM5/27/14
to padyadhaaraa पद्यधारा, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
स्यादेवेति
नास्ति। यथा स्त्र्युल्लेखाभावे, ताः सुशिक्षिता एवेति नास्ति।
न तु अस्ति ।
एवं
विचिन्त्यात्मानमेव वञ्चयसि। न त्वमस्मानवगच्छसि यथा भावयसि। किञ्च
"please send the mail from your office e-mail id with your qualification and designation." इत्यनेन ज्ञेयं श्रद्धाविहीनैरपि यदत्र अशिक्षित-सुशिक्षितयोर् भेदः कल्पितुमिष्ट इति। किं अस्माभिर् न ज्ञातं समाजे गौरवयुक्तपदेषु प्रेतमरून्मादादिमतग्रस्थास् सन्तीति?
भोः, इदानीं मामप्य् असत्यवादिनं कथयसि। यदि मम तादृशोऽभिप्रायोऽभविष्यत्, न उपरिष्टस्पष्टीकरणम् अलेखिष्यम्।
न वा अस्माकं सम्भाषणैर् नैकैस् स्पष्टं तुभ्यं यत् त्वया दृश्यमानं त्वत्संस्कारोद्भवं मे नैव तथा
न वा अस्माकं सम्भाषणैर् नैकैस् स्पष्टं तुभ्यं यत् त्वया दृश्यमानं त्वत्संस्कारोद्भवं मे नैव तथा
दृश्यत इति?
यथा ऽनन्तमूर्तिवृत्तान्ते अवदाव, कलयेर् अस्मान् मतान्धान् मूर्खान् बुद्धिवैशाल्यविहीनान् पशून्, अस्माभिस्तु कलयसे मलिनदृष्टिर् म्लेच्छः।
किं तेन? धर्मे श्रद्धायाञ्च असम्मतौ सतायामपि काव्ये रसे च यावद्युक्तं सुकुमारभावविनिमयस् स्यात्।
विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
May 28, 2014, 1:00:22 AM5/28/14
to padyadhaaraa पद्यधारा, Vasuvaj, Suhas Mahesh
भाषादोषपरिमार्जनात्मकं
प्रायश्चित्तम् -
2014-05-27 19:27 GMT-07:00 विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki) <vishvas...@gmail.com>:
प्रेतमरून्मादादिमतग्रस्थास् सन्तीति?
...ग्रस्तास्
न वा अस्माकं सम्भाषणैर् नैकैस् स्पष्टं तुभ्यं यत् त्वया दृश्यमानं त्वत्संस्कारोद्भवं मे नैव तथा दृश्यत इति?
त्वत्संस्कारोद्भवो
अस्माभिस्तु कलयसे मलिनदृष्टिर् म्लेच्छः।
कल्यसे
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages