i think it was for p2pu as a whole. i do like the idea that people who have questions could contact an individual person directly with their concerns or questions.Jessy--
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Pippa Buchanan <Pippa.B...@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________great feedback from jessy - but I accidentally deferred the message in the moderation filter. sorry jessy!
switching the order of the explanation makes sense - thanks for pointing that out!
re volunteer course mentors - i recall us discussing it, but it didn't go much further then that. Was this meant to be a general P2PU approach or SoW specific? Once we've got tags in place we'll also be able to point organisers towards many other organsiers working on similar topics.
P*
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jessy Kate Schingler <je...@jessykate.com>
To: "School of Webcraft (Sow)" <p2pu-w...@lists.p2pu.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:43:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [p2pu-webcraft] Please review: default decline message for non Webcraft courses and groups
cool :) here's a couple thoughts:i would put the description about SoW and what differentiates it from p2pu *before* your decline statement, so that when you say, "it doesn't fit" you've already given the context for why.also when you say "let the community know" i would have a link to an individual person, as well a link to the mailing list. otherwise "community" seems a bit vague. i imagine many people won';t want to join a mailing list just to worksop their topic and if that's the only option, we might lose them, so having a human is useful IMHO.didn't we discuss the idea of having volunteer course mentors/contacts?Jessy--
p2pu-webcraft mailing listhttp://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft
_______________________________________________
p2pu-webcraft mailing list
p2pu-w...@lists.p2pu.org
http://lists.p2pu.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pu-webcraft