FYI Maria, when I ran a course I didn't include it in my contracted hours.
If you want to thank your course organisers you could do that by
providing them with certificates, a reference letter listing the
skills they developed as organisers (facilitating, online team
management) and of course there's always the popular option of sending
them t-shirts.
I agree. In principle there is no "rule" against paying people to run
courses in the schools, and I think that's fine, because, I doubt that
a grant proposal for funds to pay course organizers would be
successful. We can deal with this at the concrete level.
P
I think Pippa makes an important point.
As a pain member of staff at P2PU, it was made clear from the beginning that I would never invoice for the time I spend doing "course stuff". Because P2P is all about volunteering, as an organiser or participant in courses.
The time I am paid for is spent doing admin for the project - basically the kind of scuttlebutt work that no-one wanted to volunteer to do.
B
re Maria/Math: You should definitely get folks to put these courses up on P2PU.org before the orientation begins on 10 January.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Alison Jean Cole <alisonj...@gmail.com> wrote:
re Maria/Math: You should definitely get folks to put these courses up on P2PU.org before the orientation begins on 10 January.
For now, the focus is mainly going to be on running a half dozen or so
successful courses. As Maria said earlier, any work to build a
coalition would be time-consuming -- but we agree that a successful
"incubation" round at P2PU will make a big difference and will likely
attract many interesting, interested, people. It's probably a bit
early to even guess about what we might spend money on (just my view).
Regarding the aims of the "Math Future" school: currently a lot of it
is drawing on Maria's existing community and practices, but I for one
am hoping to get my math-related projects into the mix (I don't think
we need "two" math schools, but one that includes various different
approaches would be cool!) -- and I'd like to see other individuals
and groups getting involved as time goes by.
This morning, I was kicking around an expanded version of the name
that I rather like, "School of the Mathematical Future" -- which I
think gets at both the pedagogical and technological aspects of the
project. Not everyone involved with mathematics or math education
would be interested in a project with this focus -- but I think there
will likely be quite a few who are interested. Just what sort
organizing work (e.g. outreach or inreach) is most useful depends on
various factors (including various factors that are relevant across
P2PU, and some that are specific to this particular
school-in-incubation).