They don't say sexual orientation that doesn't lead to harm is an equal or human right
David Jeffrey Spetch
I was just in a Lawyers office discussing Land Lord Tenant issues and I happened to mention that I am an activist and he asked me what do I address and so I demonstrated the non contestable factual evidence which proves that every religion is based upon a fundamental of lies and he contradicted none of the facts and began to tell me that some of his good friends are religious and he was telling me they are not all bad people until I reminded him that no matter how much good they claim to do they still support a factually proven fundamental of lies which has lead the globe to war and divide for thousands of years leading to the death of millions / billions right to this very day. That kind of silenced him until I went on to say that the religious, when they do something they do it in support of promoting their fundamental of lies and he said you can';t prove that and I replied, when you step into a food bank and look up at the walls etc. there is religious filth crap there everywhere and if they were not doing it to promote their fundamental of lies aka their religious filth then why are they attaching religious filth when they attempt to help people and again he grew silent. He couldn't handle the slut walk (I guess it was an uncomfortable topic for him) so I refrained from getting to my point that nudity / near nudity sexually arouses and unfortunately we do have rapists. After all I was there for legal assistance for a specific issue. I shared with him that sexual orientation was never an equal or human right and he went on to say yes say sexual orientation that doesn't lead to the harm of others or animals is an equal or human right, they say sexual orientation is an equal or human right. And I said but that is not what they claim, they claim sexual orientation is an equal or human right thus generalizing it and yet:
Sexual orientation describes what a person has sex with.
Beastiality: Clearly describes the orientation of a person that has sex with animals, when someone says beastiality the general public knows it is human having sex with an animal and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Pedophilia: Clearly describes the orientation of a adult that has sex with children, when someone says pedophilia, the general public knows it an adult having sex with a child and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Incest: Clearly describes the orientation of a being that has sex with a biological family member, when someone says incest, the general public knows it a being having sex with a biological family member and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Which is the very non contestable factual evidence which proves that sexual orientation never was an equal or human right, but the gays obviously lacked the consideration to even give that a second thought. Their bias agenda is obviously too important for them to care about taking into consideration what non contestable fact reveals. I honestly question whether or not they want pedophilia, incest and beastiality legalized because they are after all primarily the ones who have been going around claiming that sexual orientation ever was an equal or human right to begin with.
So if you seek to correct the apparent intent of meaning, then admit sexual orientation never was an equal or human right and simply claim that "sexual orientation that doesn't lead to the harm of others is an equal or human right" because that at least carries validity and doesn't generalize all sexual orientations because again "sexual orientation" never was an equal or human right!
I am glad that Lawyer and I had that talk because I am confident that Members of Parliament / Legislation etc. didn't understand what may now be clear to you all.
and yeah I will keep that Lawyers name confidential.
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!David Jeffrey Spetch
Major Correction In Yesterdays Article On Sexual Orientation
For those of you who have already read the article, here is the correction and other foundational facts and information. For those of you who have not yet read the article, you may skip this and find it all within the re write of yesterdays article just below.
again sexual orientation never was an equal or human right.
Homosexuality as a "human" right only means gays may legally have sex as heterosexuals can legally have sex but that doesn't mean that homosexuality equals heterosexuality for the foremost important and undeniably obvious reason that we as the human race even exists is because thanks to heterosexuality, yet it is undeniably no secret that if it were up to homosexuality to sustain the population we would have died off thousands of years ago. I notice that every time I bring up these obvious facts homosexuals try to make the issue about whether or not it is natural or choice to be gay. Sure, some people are born with physical defects and I understand that they didn't have a choice in the matter, I understand that some people are born with mental defects and it is not a choice they made as some people are born with sexual defects. Luckily for the homosexuals, their sexual defect does not lead to the harm of others or animals. In one way this discriminates other sexual defective orientations because being that it is natural for people to be born gay it is also natural for people to also be born with other sexual defects (even wild animals practice incest, homosexuality, pedophilia and I have even seen a domesticated dog mount a domestic cat) yet luckily for homosexuals that the act of consensual homosexual sex doesn't not lead to the harm of others or animals. Defective sexual orientations which leads to the harm of others or animals are incest which is inbreeding that leads to serious birth defects (harm of children), pedophilia which is obviously abusing children and beastiality which is abusing animals. In the end, natural or not you have a choice to make no matter who you are!
The only thing equal about it being a human right is that both heterosexuals and homosexuals can have sex care free of being threatened by the law for doing such responsibly.
I also, when speaking with the lawyer brought up mandatory education of governing ways kindergarten throughout high school and I went on to explain how abusers get away with taking advantage of children for example, use lies to make the lies the child's reality in order to allow the abuser to continue to get away with abusing the child because the child's reality are not the laws and governing we are all expected to abide by / pay for. I also mentioned that if ignorance of the law is no excuse then why do lawyers / judges go to law school?! Yet meanwhile the rest of society is not educated of the law / governings we are all expected to abide by and pay for?! The expression "ignorance of the law is no excuse" is nothing more than a sick joke which only deceptively supports the law as an industry not justice. The lawyer said nothing / remained quiet. (I suppose they all sign something upon completing the Barr exam that deceptively keeps them from being able to reveal certain information to the public)
I recently had the cavities in my teeth ground away and since the fillings have been in, is my back wisdom tooth especially ever in so much pain (more acute then an abscessed tooth) the majority of the time as of late, it seriously cuts into my attention span as well as my tenacity to utilize my memory so I came back today to make sure that what I share is clearly written to be accurately understood.
So with that being said, here is the article re written:
They don't say sexual orientation that doesn't lead to harm is an equal or human right
I was just in a Lawyers office discussing Land Lord Tenant issues and I happened to mention that I am an activist and he asked me what do I address and so I demonstrated the non contestable factual evidence which proves that every religion is based upon a fundamental of lies and he contradicted none of the facts and began to tell me that some of his good friends are religious and he was telling me they are not all bad people until I reminded him that no matter how much good they claim to do they still support a factually proven fundamental of lies which has lead the globe to war and divide for thousands of years leading to the death of millions / billions right to this very day. That kind of silenced him until I went on to say that the religious, when they do something they do it in support of promoting their fundamental of lies and he said you can';t prove that and I replied, when you step into a food bank and look up at the walls etc. there is religious filth crap there everywhere and if they were not doing it to promote their fundamental of lies aka their religious filth then why are they attaching religious filth when they attempt to help people and again he grew silent. He couldn't handle the slut walk (I guess it was an uncomfortable topic for him) so I refrained from getting to my point that nudity / near nudity sexually arouses and unfortunately we do have rapists. After all I was there for legal assistance for a specific issue. I also, when speaking with the lawyer brought up mandatory education of governing ways kindergarten throughout high school and I went on to explain how abusers get away with taking advantage of children for example, use lies to make the lies the child's reality in order to allow the abuser to continue to get away with abusing the child because the child's reality are not the laws and governing we are all expected to abide by / pay for. I also mentioned that if ignorance of the law is no excuse then why do lawyers / judges go to law school?! Yet meanwhile the rest of society is not educated of the law / governings we are all expected to abide by and pay for?! The expression "ignorance of the law is no excuse" is nothing more than a sick joke which only deceptively supports the law as an industry not justice. The lawyer said nothing / remained quiet. (I suppose they all sign something upon completing the Barr exam that deceptively keeps them from being able to reveal certain information to the public) I shared with him that sexual orientation was never an equal or human right and he went on to say yes say sexual orientation that doesn't lead to the harm of others (or animals for that matter I will add) is an equal or human right, they say sexual orientation is an equal or human right. And I said but that is not what they claim, they claim sexual orientation is an equal or human right thus generalizing it and yet:
Sexual orientation describes what a person has sex with.
Beastiality: Clearly describes the orientation of a person that has sex with animals, when someone says beastiality the general public knows it is human having sex with an animal and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Pedophilia: Clearly describes the orientation of a adult that has sex with children, when someone says pedophilia, the general public knows it an adult having sex with a child and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Incest: Clearly describes the orientation of a being that has sex with a biological family member, when someone says incest, the general public knows it a being having sex with a biological family member and there is no denying with any validity that it clearly describes this sexual orientation.
Which is the very non contestable factual evidence which proves that sexual orientation never was an equal or human right, but the gays obviously lacked the consideration to even give that a second thought. Their bias agenda is obviously too important for them to care about taking into consideration what non contestable fact reveals. I honestly question whether or not they want pedophilia, incest and beastiality legalized because they are after all primarily the ones who have been going around claiming that sexual orientation ever was an equal or human right to begin with.
So if you seek to correct the apparent intent of meaning, then admit sexual orientation never was an equal or human right and simply claim that "sexual orientation that doesn't lead to the harm of others is a human right" because that at least carries validity and doesn't generalize all sexual orientations because again "sexual orientation" never was an equal or human right!
For homosexuality as a "human" right only means gays may legally have sex as heterosexuals can legally have sex but that doesn't mean that homosexuality equals heterosexuality for the foremost important and undeniably obvious reason that we as the human race even exists is because thanks to heterosexuality, yet it is undeniably no secret that if it were up to homosexuality to sustain the population we would have died off thousands of years ago. I notice that every time I bring up these obvious facts homosexuals try to make the issue about whether or not it is natural or choice to be gay. Sure, some people are born with physical defects and I understand that they didn't have a choice in the matter, I understand that some people are born with mental defects and it is not a choice they made as some people are born with sexual defects. Luckily for the homosexuals, their sexual defect does not lead to the harm of others or animals. In one way this discriminates other sexual defective orientations because being that it is natural for people to be born gay it is also natural for people to also be born with other sexual defects (even wild animals practice incest, homosexuality, pedophilia and I have even seen a domesticated dog mount a domestic cat) yet luckily for homosexuals that the act of consensual homosexual sex doesn't not lead to the harm of others or animals. Defective sexual orientations which leads to the harm of others or animals are incest which is inbreeding that leads to serious birth defects (harm of children), pedophilia which is obviously abusing children and beastiality which is abusing animals. In the end, natural or not you have a choice to make no matter who you are!
The only thing equal about it being a human right is that both heterosexuals and homosexuals can have sex care free of being threatened by the law for doing such responsibly.
I am glad that Lawyer and I had that talk because I am confident that Members of Parliament / Legislation etc. didn't understand what may now be clear to you all.
and yeah I will keep that Lawyers name confidential.
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, be strong!
Also if you are an Age Of Mythology (with or without the Titans Expansion) Fan or an Age of Wonders Shadow Magic Fan I am the very best on the globe at creating scenarios at both genres. 2010 I decided to figure out how to make things work in these games with the intent to create the very best any one has ever played for both genres and from there I succeeded with ease. You can find the links to download and play the games for free (As long as you have Age of Mythology with or without the Titans expansion / also if you have Age of Wonders Shadow Magic) you do not have to sign up for anything / no strings, just click on the link, download and then follow the read me instructions. You will find 2 Titans expansion 3 vs 3 multi player scenarios (one was also adapted to a one player scenario) you will find one 3 vs 3 regular Age of Mythology Multi player scenario with a one player adaptation as well several Age of Mythology 1 player scenarios. You will also find The 1 player Age of Wonders Shadow Magic scenarios. Again I make the very best on the globe ever created and they will surpass your expectations of these games and I guarantee it. It's my freebie to you all, but just know as you will find out that I do it all in support for the well being of the future of the life on this planet.
-
You may find these links on my You Tube Channel which you may find here. (Look on the lower left hand side of my channel page)
http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidJSpetch