assalamu `alaykum wa rahmatullah, in reply to the question:>regarding raising
>the hands for dua, and wiping the face afterwards? Is it allowed,
>commendable, and sunnah? I think al-Albani declares the hadith to be be
>weak to wipe the face after dua. If not al-Albani, another Salafiyy
>scholar said this.
al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar in Bulugh al-maram (#1343) after citing the different
da`if narrations regarding this, says: wa majmu`uha yaqtadi annahu hasan.
"From their collated weight it is concluded that the hadith is hasan."
This explains why it is considered Sunna, as found in many of the books
of fiqh, and Allah knows best.Blessings and peace on the Prophet, his Family, and his Companions.
Fouad Haddad
"The Prophet's Prayer Described" lists 3 ahadith and all three are
classified as being weak (daeef) - concerning wiping the face after making
dua."The view that wiping the face after dua is not prescribed is strengthened
by the fact that there are many authentic ahadith about raising the hands
in supplication, and in none of them is there a mention of wiping the
face; this shows, Allah Willing, that it is unacceptable and not
prescribed." (p. 113)
[rest deleted]al-hamdu lillah, I have quoted the verdict of al-hafiz Ibn Hajar Asqalani
from Bulugh al-maram, and GardenRue has quoted the contrary verdict of
Shaykh Nassir al-Din al-Albani from the book "The Prophet's prayer described."Those who have some idea about the status of each of these scholars in Islam,
should have no difficulty deciding who is probably more correct insha Allah,
bearing in mind that each has examined exactly the same evidence and
that the fact that one comes chronologically long after the other neither adds
nor retrieves anything from their respective judgments.Those who do not know who these scholars are, can take their clue from the
fact that the overwhelming majority of Muslims and Muslim scholars the world
over raise their hands in du`a and then wipe their faces, and have done so
for centuries, and the Prophet said: "My Community shall not agree upon
error." Wallahu al-musta`an.Fouad Haddad
>"status" accoring to who?The status of Shaykh al-Islam Hafiz Ibn Hajar is without contest that of a
giant in the field of hadith and fiqh according to the scholars that came
after him until our time, regardless of their school. You cannot do without
Fath al-Bari if you study anything about hadith, or about Sahih al-Bukhari.
That is not true. Whatever they say which is more correct by the standards of
Ahl al-Sunna, I agree with it. Ibn Taymiyya said that there may well be reward
in celebrating Mawlid and I agree with him completely. He also wrote that the
path of tasawwuf is founded on love and I agree with him on this also; and
on many other matters. Similarly Albani wrote that it is an innovation to pray
with nothing on one's head and I agree with him completely. It is short-
sighted in the extreme to say that I disregard anyone who disagrees with
me, in fact I may know of and agree with their positions more than those who
follow them blindly, but I only mention what is relevant to particular issues.
The Prophet said: "Stick to the greater mass of the Muslims" (al-sawad
al-a`zam), because there is protection from misguidance in that. The truth is
that in our time those who purportedly fight bid`a are the biggest and most
arrogant innovators yet. It is they who are first to reject the true Sunna and
reject those who uphold it.
This is definitely bid`a, as Imam Bukhari said when someone tried to test
his orthodoxy. Ibn al-Subki relates it with his isnad in Tabaqat al-Shafi`iyya.As for beads then they are Sunna as stated by Imam Suyuti, and Imam Shawkani
said that their exact description is immaterial in determining resemblance
or difference with what the Companions used, since the quality of the act
itself is what is established as lawful, namely: the fact of counting dhikr on
beads. This is undoubtedly more intelligent than Albani's position on the
issue. Allah knows best.
3a8082e126