You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to OxCal
I am an ecologist, somewhat to new to OxCal and have been calibrating radiocarbon dates for Bison bison from the Neotoma database. The dates are mostly in the last 1000 years. Can anyone tell me why most of them giver me a messages that say "Warning! Date may extend out of range"
Thanks for any insights.
Cecil
Christopher Ramsey
unread,
Jun 15, 2023, 6:14:36 PM6/15/23
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to OxCal group
Yes - sure - that is a good question.
The reason is that the IntCal20 curve ends in 1950 when the radiocarbon date value is around 200. If your date is anywhere near this the assumption (lacking any other information) is that there could be a match beyond the end of the curve. Of course we know
that after than the radiocarbon levels rose rapidly but that is not given explicitly in the curve and so the algorithm reports that the date could extend beyond the curve.
I attach an extreme example of this where the last range is unconstrained.
You can get around this by using one the of the bomb curves which have the end of IntCal20 included. As a default these use a much higher resolution so you might want to set that to 1 which is appropriate in this pre-bomb period. A comparison command file
would look like: