cross-reference k parameter in two P_Sequences
Erik Marsh
MILLARD, ANDREW R.
Hi Erik,
I think you can either explicitly model k0, or the modifier of k0.
This models k0 as the same for both sequences using the prior you had:
Plot()
{
k0 = 2*10^U(-2,2);
P_Sequence("Core A",1,"=k0")
{
Boundary();
R_Simulate("DateA1",1100,25)
{
z=900;
};
R_Simulate("DateA2",1150,25)
{
z=850;
};
Boundary();
};
P_Sequence("Core B",1,"=k0")
{
Boundary();
R_Simulate("DateB1",1200,25)
{
z=800;
};
R_Simulate("DateB2",1250,25)
{
z=750;
};
Boundary();
};
};
While this models the modifier. It gives a more familiar result as it is usually the modifier that is plotted when k is allowed to vary.
Plot()
{
k_expr = U(-2,2);
P_Sequence("Core A",1,2,"=k_expr ")
{
Boundary();
R_Simulate("DateA1",1100,25)
{
z=900;
};
R_Simulate("DateA2",1150,25)
{
z=850;
};
Boundary();
};
P_Sequence("Core B",1,2,"=k_expr ")
{
Boundary();
R_Simulate("DateB1",1200,25)
{
z=800;
};
R_Simulate("DateB2",1250,25)
{
z=750;
};
Boundary();
};
};
Best wishes
Andrew
--
Prof. Andrew Millard
Department of Archaeology,
Durham University, UK
Email: A.R.M...@durham.ac.uk
Personal page: https://www.durham.ac.uk/staff/a-r-millard/
Dunbar 1650 MOOC: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/battle-of-dunbar-1650
From: ox...@googlegroups.com <ox...@googlegroups.com>
On Behalf Of Erik Marsh
Sent: 06 October 2025 23:07
To: OxCal <ox...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: cross-reference k parameter in two P_Sequences
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OxCal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
oxcal+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oxcal/454922d0-dc4d-4171-b622-c4320231ff46n%40googlegroups.com.