Usinf After in a sequence

15 views
Skip to first unread message

Chris Chinnock (Chris)

unread,
Jul 31, 2025, 3:16:34 PMJul 31
to OxCal
Hi all, 
Im looking for some help with a model I am putting together for a couple of features dated to the early Roman period (Britain). 

The key bit Im not sure I have built right is the second sequence (Tank). This is a wood-lined tank, which after having fallen out of use, was backfilled and then pits were subsequently cut. A nice little stratigraphic sequence. We have a dendro date which has suggested a felling date of late AD76. We also have a date fromt he backfill deposits (FTMC-QG69-32), and a date from one of the later pits (FTMC-QG69-31). I have attempted to model this but am not sure if I have done so correctly (see code below). I ran the model, and it seemed to work but the agreement was coming through as 0.0%. 

I'd be grateful if someone could take a look and let me know where I have gone wrong. 

Cheers

Chris 

 Plot()
 {
  Sequence()
  {
   Boundary("Spring start");
   Phase("Upper spring")
   {
    Sequence()
    {
     R_Date("SUERC-132244 (1574)",1725,24);
     R_Date("SUERC-132245 (1261)",1730,24);
    };
    Sequence("Tank")
    {
     After("1620 Felling")
     {
      Date("1620",76);
     };
     R_Date("FTMC-QG69-32 (1635)",2113,30);
     R_Date("FTMC-QG69-31 (1631)",2091,30);
    };
   };
   Boundary("Spring end");
  };
 };

John Meadows

unread,
Jul 31, 2025, 4:30:53 PMJul 31
to ox...@googlegroups.com
dear Chris
the only problem I can see is that both the samples from the stratigraphically later contexts appear to be older than the tank. This is not an OxCal problem, rather a question of archaeological interpretation - how long had that material been hanging around before it was deposited where you found it? i.e. where did the fill of the later contexts come from? How can you be confident that organic remains in that fill are not redeposited from much older layers? if, as you say, the tank was deliberately backfilled, the risk of dating residual material must be fairly high - although you might not notice if it wasn't older than the tank itself. 
best regards
John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OxCal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oxcal+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/oxcal/eb46ebd5-21b5-4f8b-b331-f7331224bdf2n%40googlegroups.com.

Chris Chinnock (Chris)

unread,
Jul 31, 2025, 5:09:18 PMJul 31
to OxCal
Thanks John, 

Yes, I think there must be some residuality here. 

Chris

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages