Dear Christopher,
I had sometime ago asked about this simple model of mine where D_Sequence was put as terminus post quem constraint for a Charcoal Outlier Model. It worked well with the previous version and curve, but using the same code now (v.4.4 and IntCal20) I was getting an error message of zero distribution for the charcoal model and empty cells named "object" in the output table. After consulting your reply to
this entry from few days ago, I realised it might be that the old code has wrong syntax for the new version.
After adjusting the syntax I don't get the 'zero distribution' error anymore and the results are almost the same as the ones from the previous version. I assume the changes shown below are correct, but I am not absolutely sure about it (I basically took out the curly brackets - {}; - from the 'Outlier' command).
Also, it seems that in the new version the runs of the same model take a bit longer, is there a reason for it?
Here's the old code (see also images in attachment):
Plot()
{
Outlier_Model("Charcoal",Exp(1,-10,0),U(0,3),"t");
Sequence()
{
Boundary("Start 8");
Phase("Layer 8")
{
D_Sequence( "SOV-18")
{
R_Date("BE-12589.1.1 R.1-11", 3944, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap(46);
R_Date("BE-12590.1.1 R.48-58", 3897, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap(74);
R_Date("BE-12587.1.1 R.122-129", 3842, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (32);
R_Date("BE-12594.1.1 R.3-13", 3803, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (28);
R_Date("BE-12584.1.1 R.3-9", 3831, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (13);
R_Date("BE-12593.1.1 R.2-40", 3815, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (18);
R_Date("BE-12596.1.1 R.2-12 ", 3787, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (1);
R_Date("BE-12585.1.1 R.35-41", 3767, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (22);
R_Date("BE-12595.1.1 R.25-34.", 3724, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (14);
R_Date("BE-12588.1.1 R.250-257", 3762, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (11);
R_Date("BE-12586.1.1 R.80-89", 3775, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap ( 4);
Date("modelled end-date last ring (2σ)")
{
color="black";
};
{
color="white";
};
};
};
Boundary("End 8");
Boundary("Start 7");
Phase("Layer 7")
{
R_Date("Ly-8287", 3695, 45);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
R_Date("Ly-8288", 3770, 45);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
R_Date("Ly-8289", 3760, 45);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
R_Date("Ly-11918", 3770, 40);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
R_Date("DEM – 2353", 3821, 30);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
R_Date("Ly-7012", 4035, 55);
{
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
};
Boundary("End 7");
};
};
And the with adapted syntax:
Plot()
{
Outlier_Model("Charcoal",Exp(1,-10,0),U(0,3),"t");
Sequence()
{
Boundary("Start 8");
Phase("Layer 8")
{
D_Sequence( "SOV-18")
{
R_Date("BE-12589.1.1 R.1-11", 3944, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap(46);
R_Date("BE-12590.1.1 R.48-58", 3897, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap(74);
R_Date("BE-12587.1.1 R.122-129", 3842, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (32);
R_Date("BE-12594.1.1 R.3-13", 3803, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (28);
R_Date("BE-12584.1.1 R.3-9", 3831, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (13);
R_Date("BE-12593.1.1 R.2-40", 3815, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (18);
R_Date("BE-12596.1.1 R.2-12 ", 3787, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (1);
R_Date("BE-12585.1.1 R.35-41", 3767, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (22);
R_Date("BE-12595.1.1 R.25-34.", 3724, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (14);
R_Date("BE-12588.1.1 R.250-257", 3762, 24)
{
color="black";
};
Gap (11);
R_Date("BE-12586.1.1 R.80-89", 3775, 23)
{
color="black";
};
Gap ( 4);
Date("modelled end-date last ring (2σ)")
{
color="black";
};
color="white";
};
};
Boundary("End 8");
Boundary("Start 7");
Phase("Layer 7")
{
R_Date("Ly-8287", 3695, 45);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
R_Date("Ly-8288", 3770, 45);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
R_Date("Ly-8289", 3760, 45);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
R_Date("Ly-11918", 3770, 40);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
R_Date("DEM – 2353", 3821, 30);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
R_Date("Ly-7012", 4035, 55);
Outlier("Charcoal", 1);
};
Boundary("End 7");
};
};
P.s. Should the resolution in such a combined model be set to r=1?
Many thanks for the program and the updates,
Best wishes,
Andrej