About slice selection problem

50 views
Skip to first unread message

doggyj...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 23, 2019, 9:12:23 AM2/23/19
to OpenVirteX-discuss
Hi everyone,

When I want to use openvirtex to be my splitting slices scheme,
I met some problems.
One of these is that if I want to use the command: python ovxctl.py -n connectHost {tenant_id} {virtual_dpid} {Host_mac}
I have to specify which host is connected with the virtual switch.
Then how should I do if I want to implement a slice selection. That decides which slice will the request of a user go through upon the user's ip address.

That is, if there are two slices which are split at first. And I want to make the packets which belongs to those whose IP prefix is 10.0.0.0/16 go through the slice 1. On the other hand, the packets which belongs to those whose IP prefix is 10.1.0.0/16 go through the other slice. But, we don't know how many users are in the subnet 10.0.0.0/16, of course we can't know the mac address of their hosts.

But because of the command, we have to specify which host is connected with the virtual switch on the beginning, but how could I specify the mac address that the users I don't know.

Gyeongsik Yang

unread,
Feb 24, 2019, 1:48:49 AM2/24/19
to doggyj...@gmail.com, OpenVirteX-discuss
Hi,
OpenVirteX assumes that the tenant knows the host's address information in advance.
More specifically, the current implementation does not allow for the allocation of specific address spaces region to a given tenant. 
Rather, we should specify each the address that belongs to the specific virtual network (or slice) for each host's individual MAC.

Thanks,

Gyeongsik Yang 

Ph.D. student
Operating Systems Lab, Korea University



2019년 2월 23일 (토) 오후 11:12, <doggyj...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenVirteX-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ovx-discuss...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages