The peer to peer (P2P) lending market is also growing due to rising adoption of digitalization in the banking sector. Due to peer to peer (P2P) lending platforms, the transactions have become more transparent in nature. On the other hand, the strict government regulations for approvals of loans are hindering the growth of the global peer to peer (P2P) lending market. In addition, lack of awareness among people regarding peer to peer (P2P) lending, is also restricting the expansion of global peer to peer (P2P) lending market.
The primary strategies used by key players in the global peer to peer (P2P) lending market are acquisitions, partnerships, as well as product creation and upgradation. In addition, the government of developed and developing regions is also collaborating with market players for the growth and expansion of the global peer to peer (P2P) lending market.
North America is the largest segment for peer to peer (P2P) lending market in terms of region.The U.S. is dominating the peer to peer (P2P) lending market in the North America region. The adoption of peer to peer (P2P) lending platforms is driving the expansion of the peer to peer (P2P) lending market in North America. The need for peer to peer (P2P) lending platforms in the region is also being driven by the adoption of innovative technology.
Small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) can also count on getting a loan through a P2P lending platform. If a startup needs extra funding for asset purchase, research and development, stock purchase, expansion or acquisition, it can get a loan from 25,000 to up to 75,000 (sometimes even more).
Ornithocheirus simus lacks an anterior expansion of the rostrum. As noticed by Owen (1861), there is matrix adhered on the right side of the specimen, which can give the false impression that the palate is broader at the fourth pair of alveoli. Another interesting feature noted by Owen (1861) is the separation between the alveoli of the first pair, equivalent to the largest diameter of the alveolus, and that the bone between these two alveoli projects below from the level of the palate, but not forming an elongated structure. Owen (1861) observed that no median ridge is preserved.
Seeley (1870) compared and distinguished Ornithocheirus dentatus from Ornithocheirus [=Camposipterus(?)] sedgwickii based on a wider palate and smaller teeth. It is hard to understand what he meant by wider palate, since CAMSM B 54544 is quite smaller individual in comparison to the holotype of Camposipterus(?) sedgwickii, but both species can be further distinguished by the lack of an anterior expansion and of a dorsally curved palate in Ornithocheirus dentatus, besides a lower rostrum in the latter.
aa06259810