Scouts Intranet

[Brunilda Chestnut]

Iam also frustrated with Scoutbook having changed how it tracks things like hiking miles. When I click on enter activity log, Scoutbook takes me to Internet Advancement. Why can I no longer track miles in Scoutbook?

NOTE: The instructions on this page are for Internet Advancement. Parents and Scouts can also view and enter activities using the Scouting App. The Scouting app is a mobile device Scoutbook app that can be used by Scouts and parents whose units use...

That may make sense for Scouts BSA but not for cub scouts where parents are Akela and can enter an sign of on items including service hours. if we can not do this we will not be reporting our service hours which I suspect will not make local council happy.

@JohnColligan - I would point out that just as with advancement there is a approval there is there not ? Not really any different save for it being on the new program stack. The approvals are done by The key 3, UAC and key 3 delegate.

@DannyZayas - the move away thing was a move away from scoutnet on which the old Internet Advancement was built and run. That is done and advancement is now on scoutbook.scouting.org along with the logs. This allows for the enhancements that have been requested by users as the scoutbook code will not provide the enhancement ability.

With that said, you can run the report to the screen (not to PDF), and a normal Windows copy and paste of the resulting table into Excel works perfectly fine. Rows and columns are intact, number formats are preserved, and

I can see a concern about backing-up the information, or sharing it with someone else who handles it for the unit or district, particularly given the current limitations on access. Besides, as @Stephen_Hornak pointed out on this or another related thread, backups are good. :^)

There are many different types of innovation. Some are internal (involving employees, incremental innovation, etc.), and some are external (involving customers, open innovation, etc.). All these types can be very effective for organizations.

Another aspect is the fact that tech scouters do not work in a vacuum. While the scouter can gather all of the information, research a company, follow up on prospective partners and acquisitions, the decision to proceed usually lies elsewhere. Accounting, Legal, Manpower, IT and other departments will all need to weigh in, and a decision must be reached by the CEO and the VPs, the Board of Directors and other stakeholders.

While the tech scout is well versed in gathering the information and what all means, however, the decision makers usually do not have the time (or sometimes the ability) to wade through all the information and reach a conclusion. Therefore, there needs to be some way in which the essence can be presented to the decision makers without all the excessive information which comes along with it.

Many companies just use an Excel sheet when scouting. But a task this intricate really needs its own dedicated platform. Scouting platforms empower companies throughout the scouting process helping them search, evaluate and even negotiate.

A scouting platform will improve the efficiency of any tech scouting team by standardizing the various opportunities being examined, in order to better prioritize and compare them, both as standalone options and in comparison to each other. No two companies are the same, but the ability to place them all on equal footing is a tool which the tech scout can use to bolster or support their intuitions regarding any specific company.

A scouting platform can collate all of the available information, separate it, prioritize it and sort it, and most crucially, share the information with all other scouting team members as well as colleagues who need to see specific aspects of the gathered information. At the same time, a scouting platform can be used to combine the networks of the entire scouting team, exponentially increasing the number of people available to get information from.

Moreover, this easier data entry drives widespread adoption. Seeing the success one scout or one scouting team enjoys by using a scouting platform encourages other scouts and scouting teams to also begin using scouting platforms. In the Darwinian world of global and corporate businesses,failure to adapt could be the difference between being an acquiring company or an acquired company.

Using a scouting platform also provides you with a visible representation of the multiple interactions which are constantly going on, between scouts on the same team, between different scouting teams, between scouting teams and other departments within the company, and between different companies. A scouting platform can also be used in order to see the big picture, by finding insights hidden in your data.

A proven solution, Q-scout tightens your relationship with the business, making sure no opportunity slips by. It can also support your innovation scouting process. Use it to easily find the data you need, share and collaborate on technologies and requirements, engage the right experts within and outside your company, manage and track evaluations, build and manage your pipeline, as well as search for and report results.

We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience when visiting our website. By continuing to browse this site you agree to this use. To control your preferences, take a look at our privacy policy.

Un espacio web para mejorar la gestin de nuestras diocesanas / interdiocesanas y fomentar el intercambio de ideas y propuestas ante todas aquellas tareas que realizamos a diario desde nuestras respectivas sedes y asociaciones. Un recurso para el trabajo en red, mejora y accesibilidad.

En el caso de que s seas miembro del Comit Federal y/o de los correos de las sedes de las diocesanas/interdiocesanas, pero no puedas acceder manda tu solicitud a m...@scouts.es para gestionar tus permisos.

Si tu correo no es @gmail, posiblemente tambin te de error si no tienes una cuenta Google. Pero no pasa nada, porque tiene solucin. Simplemente sigue estas instrucciones para hacerte una cuenta en Google, sin necesidad de cambiar de correo y podrs acceder a todos los servicios Google menos al correo electrnico (Gmail).

Este sitio web utiliza cookies para mejorar su experiencia mientras navega por el sitio web. Fuera de estas cookies, las cookies que se clasifican como necesarias se almacenan en su navegador, ya que son esenciales para el funcionamiento de las funcionalidades bsicas del sitio web. Tambin utilizamos cookies de terceros que nos ayudan a analizar y comprender cmo utiliza este sitio web. Estas cookies se almacenarn en su navegador solo con su consentimiento. Tambin tiene la opcin de optar por no recibir estas cookies. Pero la exclusin voluntaria de algunas de estas cookies puede afectar su experiencia de navegacin.

Las cookies necesarias ayudan a hacer que una web sea utilizable al activar funciones bsicas, como la navegacin por la pgina y el acceso a reas seguras de la web. La web no puede funcionar correctamente sin estas cookies.

Las cookies que pueden no ser particularmente necesarias para el funcionamiento del sitio web y se utilizan especficamente para recopilar datos personales del usuario a travs de anlisis, anuncios y otros contenidos integrados se denominan cookies no necesarias. Es obligatorio obtener el consentimiento del usuario antes de ejecutar estas cookies en su sitio web.

Walmart also won in 2002 for its previous intranet, and thereby joins a very small group of companies that have won the award multiple times: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu has won for both its worldwide and Australian member firm intranets, and Cisco Systems' intranet has also been recognized twice.

Breaking with past trends, this is the first time in 10 years without any winners from Europe or from the financial sector. (GE does have a finance business, but it's not a dedicated financial services company.) The lack of banks, brokers, and insurance companies might be explained by the finance crisis: these companies had other things to occupy their attention and smaller (if any) budgets for intranet design. In contrast, there's no excuse for the poor showing of European intranet designs given that Europe accounted for 31% of the winners from 2001 to 2009. Let's see some more good European intranets next year, please.

This year, the median company size among our winners was 6,350 employees (the median is a better metric than the mean this year because Walmart is so huge that it would skew the calculation of an arithmetic mean.) From 2001 to 2006, ever-bigger organizations tended to dominate the awards, peaking in 2006, when the average company size was 107,000 employees. From 2007 to 2010, however, smaller companies became more prominent among the winners. This trend likely shows a maturing of intranet technologies: it's becoming easier and easier to build a good user experience without access to the substantial resources found in 100,000+ employee companies.

An alternative interpretation is that companies of all sizes are giving intranets higher priority and giving intranet teams more resources. The average team size this year was 14 people, which is 27% higher than the average team size in 2006 when the winning companies were much larger.

This year, 30% of the intranets had special mobile features. In previous years, we might have heralded this as a big number, but now that mobile is the big trend on the open Web, our conclusion is the opposite: intranets appear to be lagging in mobile device support.

One fairly obvious explanation might be that most intranets are accessed from the office. Also, as one team found, employees who express a desire for mobile access might not be familiar enough with their own mobile devices to actually use them easily.

3a8082e126