Dear Sir
Francis,
I received the email below as sent by Willy. The email was sent after the incident that transpired last night at the LH.
For your reference, the LOMBS Singers (the choir assigned to sing last night) was the subject of an apparent "resistance" to receive
communion a week ago. This "resistance" was never verbally and formally discussed with us. Honestly, the LOMBS Singers never had the intention of creating the impression of a resistance.
After the email sent by BB dated June 25, 2013 (attached here), the practice shifted from giving the choir communion first before the congregation to receiving last after the congregation. Upon institution of the instruction from the BB, for a few or several months we receive communion after we have finished our song. You practiced this with us with no resistance and no problems. You never even mentioned to us that
it was a problem. Usually you come to us and tell us if there was something wrong. Now you are saying it is an "abusive attitude in the UK Community". We are sorry you feel we are abusive. You could have told us.
The supposed "resistance" being raised as an issue to the group was never formally discussed with us. Surprisingly, it was an issue that was not even formally communicated within the LOM where it happened. Yet it was an issue. How do you think we felt when there were no instructions before the service and suddenly an individual approaches us with hand
gestures and commanding voice as if dealing with slaves? My parents only had to look at me and I knew what to do because I was told what to do before an incident happened.
Sadly last night, I don't know if they told you, it was disheartening that we were instructed like ducks in a pond to receive communion when the song was about to be finished in two lines. I personally did not receive communion because I was appalled by the way we were instructed. There should have been a preamble two weeks ago when a celebrant had an issue with us. There was none. There should have been a soft reminder last night
prior to the service about the celebrant's issue but unfortunately, there were still no instructions. What we got was a hand gesture and an insulting stare as if reprimanding a child to eat his/her meals. We are civilized individuals. We are not animals. The least we ask is respect.
By practice and from our experience with you, in the Embassies where we sing other than the UK, you have always made special arrangements for us to receive communion after the mass. We just followed that practice as no one brought this to our attention. We never felt it was abusive because you allowed it for us. We
believed it was acceptable because it came from you. Now we are knowing you are tired of repeating yourself to remind us. Our apologies.
It is disheartening to exist in an environment where there are no rules, or if there are rules they are left to a few individuals who don't even take the time out to communicate -- educate the people. This makes the rules pop out like mushrooms when issues happen -- issues like last night. There are also too many bosses and we don't know whose authority we follow.
Thank you for your email. At least now we know. It didn't have to take an incident like last night to make this clear. As I said, we are civilized. All we needed to do was communicate properly.
Many thanks,
TLC
References:
1. Attached email from Francis dated 25 June 2013
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greetings of peace!
Lately, one of our mass celebrants has called our attention about some of the parish choir groups who only take the communion after the communion song is over. As a result this keeps him waiting.
In light of this, our Parish Priest has sent us an explict instruction that has to be observed by all parish choir groups. Kindly refer to the email below.
Suy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Francis Central region <kikos...@hotmail.com>
To: José Manuel <mrpog...@yahoo.com>; Willy Credo <thepoor...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:04:55 AM
Subject: RE: Celebrant waits for the Choir during communion
By instruction of the BB, the choir should take communion after the congregation and should stop the song at that moment. Some choirs are not following this instruction and continue to sing even if they have received communion. it's not acceptable!
It is "not appropriate" at all that the minister, ordinary or extraordinary, has to wait for the choir to come for communion. We have to stop this abusive attitude, specially in the UK community, in USERA and in some CFC groups.
In my part, I am not waiting for the choir. If the choir's members are not coming on time, they will loose the chance to receive communion.
Usually, I am not speaking during the celebration but I advice the choir's leader after the EC. I will be more strict in the future. I am tired to repeat the same thing all time.
Thanks