Recently had occasion to sail in one of the above. At the very
least 100 were built in Owen Sound, before V & M went the way of so many
Canadian builders of small sailboats, following the Yom Kippur war and the
violent escalation of costs resulting from the OPEC cartel's squeeze on
petroleum products, including boatbuilding resins.
I'm not quite sure what `funky' means, but it might perhaps
describe the name of the boat under discussion. Picture the conversational
possibilities:- "I sail a Skunk." ... "Oh yeah? A funky Skunkie."
This model is one in a series of S-designes from Hubert
Vandestadt's board, including Shrimp, Skunk, and Siren.
The hull lines are near the extreme of chubbiness, with a
length/beam ratio very close to 2. Other hull features include a motor
mount on the transom, narrow gunwales, conventional side buoyancy tanks
doubling as seats, and a foredeck set below gunwale level, with cubby
holes under for stowage. This setup means rain and spray will not be shed
overboard. The hull, as delivered from the yard, also lacks a drainplug or
self-bailer (although there's a limber hole to let water getting under the
foredeck to drain into the open cockpit space), so that a lot of bailing
can be foreseen in wet weather. Apart from any discomfort in hiking out
while perched on a narrow gunwale, I distrust that feature on principle
because when you heel the rail under, green water is apt to pour aboard on
the low side and promote a capsize. Evidently the hope is that the hull's
great beam will confer so much stability as to prevent such a degree of
heel, but any vessel can capsize and the Skunk's stability is certainly
not infinite.
In some other respects, I think the Skunk is a microcruiser with
its motor mount, some stowage, and no special racing pretentions. I do
however wonder about its self-rescuability (not tested) after a capsize.
The boat is laid out for rowing, in addition to the usual
possibility of paddling. I found the Skunk easy to row except that the
particular oars in use were designed for a much narrower boat and were
short in the loom - meaning that one's hands were placed about a metre
apart, a strange and somewhat strained way to work. Except for the problem
of looking ahead, rowing in open water is more efficient than paddling,
especially in a hull that is somewhat tublike. Yet one can unship an oar
and paddle with it where necessary. Especially if you are already skilled
at the oars, this feature is highly desirable in my view, and could well
replace the need for a motor in a boat of this size, if used on somewhat
sheltered waters and in less than storm conditions. The sailing rig is
however designed with a rather low boom, and it and the non-windowed
mainsail tend to get in the way of complete rowing freedom.
Sailing fittings leave something to be desired. I found only one
single-sheave block, for the one-part mainsheet at its rope-type, non-
adjustable horse, in the entire vessel. Everywhere else, lines run through
chintzy little nylon rings held by deck eyes. At the mast's foot there are
three flimsy nylon cleats to anchor the main & jib halyards, and a
gooseneck downhaul; there is no factory-supplied boom vang, apparently.
All lines are synthetic, twisted rope of small diameters, but
they're soft and reasonably easy on the hands - although the one-piece
mainsheet tackle may be a sore trial in half a gale of wind.
The rig is jib-headed and of Gunter lug type, meaning that there's
a short mast and a yard of about the same length to stand nearly
vertically and provide the necessary total height to simulate the more
usual Bermudan sloop layout. The jib's height and area are however
severely limited by the mast's stumpiness. The rig is unstayed. You sail
the Skunk as you would a sloop, but I doubt it can be as closewinded. The
special appeal of the Gunter rig is that you can lower the yard and sails,
unship the mast, and bundle the whole affair inside the hull's outlines to
row to shelter in the event of a storm or a calm - but I'm not saying the
dismasting job with be easily or safely carried out during a storm for it
seems one must stand up to do the work involved.
The fins (daggerboard and rudder) have no kick-up pivoting
capabilities but the boat's owners say they always row when close to
shore. I'm accustomed to a similar daggerboard but a kick-up rudder, which
I recommend in case one merely crosses a shallows, such as a sandbar. It
is furthermore difficult and potentially dangerous to hang or unship a
rudder while your vessel rolls in a seaway - an operation that's
unnecessary if the rudder is hung before the voyage begins and unhung
after it ends.
Most such shortcomings (as I view them) can be overcome by
the owner exerting time, skill, and dollars in a refit.
We had only light breezes and I got little feel of the boat's
speed potential. However, I liked the smooth, flat wake suggestive of good
efficiency for whatever the boat has going for it.
Pete H. Sr.