Hi!
Thanks for the report, and your interest in OSV's data quality!
We currently source this versioning data
from the NVD on a best effort conversion. In this case, the immediately given data is somewhat ambiguous, and while we are looking at improving our version extraction through the addition of CVEListV5 conversion, the
data on CVEList is of a similar ambiguous quality, so isn't likely to convert well either. We have some plans to hopefully improve this conversion in the future but it is still a work-in-progress. I have noted this vulnerability as a test case for future improvement work.
We don't currently have the proper infrastructure in place to update individual records, as they will become overwritten the next time the file is reconverted from the NVD. We hope to one day have this functionality, but for now, it is not feasible.
As such, unfortunately, your current best course of action is to report this to the CVE Program to update the CVE directly.
Best regards,
Jess and the OSV Team.