Website fix

[DJ]

There's a little link on http://ostatus.org/specification that takes you to some pharmacy (selling "cytotec"), page fallen victim to spammers. Pls fix.

[Nils D.]

The specification now seems to be lost completely - can someone point me to an existing document?

[Michael V. Antosha]

Is this what you need?
https://gitorious.org/ostatus

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Nils D. <nils.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The specification now seems to be lost completely - can someone point me to
> an existing document?

--
Michael V. Antosha
http://mivael.in.ua
xmpp:m...@mivael.in.ua (Jabber ID)

[Laurent-Walter Goix]

why not put the frozen draft spec 0.2 to w3c ostatus cg wiki to give it more dignity?
the gitorious link could be useful to evolve the spec if anyone's interested...

walter

Il giorno martedì 12 marzo 2013 13:29:04 UTC+1, mivael ha scritto:

Is this what you need?
https://gitorious.org/ostatus


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Nils D. <nils.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The specification now seems to be lost completely - can someone point me to
> an existing document?


--
Michael V. Antosha
http://mivael.in.ua

xmp...@mivael.in.ua   (Jabber ID)

[Matthias Pfefferle]

+1 for the w3c wiki.

what about moving the repo from gitorious to github? I think github is more popular these days and the OStatus "organisation" is still not taken (https://github.com/ostatus)!

matthias

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ostatus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ostatus-discu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

[Melvin Carvalho]

On 12 March 2013 13:29, Michael V. Antosha <michael...@gmail.com> wrote:

Is this what you need?
https://gitorious.org/ostatus

Thanks, been looking for this for several months.

I wonder how active this project still is (aside from the older implementations)?
 

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Nils D. <nils.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The specification now seems to be lost completely - can someone point me to
> an existing document?

--
Michael V. Antosha
http://mivael.in.ua
xmpp:m...@mivael.in.ua   (Jabber ID)

[Nils D.]

Thank you very much! That was exactly what I was looking for.

Having the spec on the wiki would be nice, but I guess the w3c
community sites also allow for more "official" pages for specification
drafts.


2013/3/12 Melvin Carvalho <melvinc...@gmail.com>:

[Melvin Carvalho]

On 12 March 2013 18:25, Nils D. <nils.d...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you very much! That was exactly what I was looking for.

Having the spec on the wiki would be nice, but I guess the w3c
community sites also allow for more "official" pages for specification
drafts.

In a community group i normally put specs on a wiki page...
 

[Nils D.]

That's fine. Okay.