@pegobufi: I think you did the right thing.
tourism=attraction is deprecated anyway. Better would be to use tourism_attraction=yes.
a tourism attraction is the Eiffel tower, or a castle or famous museum or a specific statue or perhaps even a great looking waterfall or "the oldest tree in the country", but to mark an entire region is not correct from my point of view.
This tag is under discussion anyway. Why is one "thing" more an attraction than another.
(
node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
way[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
relation[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
);
out;
Of course you can use it only with node, way or relation. But I only find nodes in general (like the Eiffel tower, Brandenburger tor, etcetera)
like
node[tourism=attraction]({{bbox}});
out;
And when you use that in an area with a lot of those tourist attractions (big older cities are mostly crowded with these things), you find multiple orange (actually light brown) areas.
If I use the overpass query in Den Haag (The Hague), then Madurodam is crowded with those tourism=attraction tags, giving quite some orange areas.
So yes: the orange area is a "tourism=attaction" rendering.
It's more a semi-transparent light-brown by the way.
Harry