Defending the middle ground

[David Wojick]

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/05/17/20-years-of-public-access-to-the-results-of-federally-funded-research-an-interview-with-the-scholarly-publishing-roundtable-part-2/

It is actually part 1. Presenting the US public access program as a big success for OA. Others may disagree.

David

[Glenn Hampson]

Thanks for sharing this David. Back in the early heyday of this listserv, we had an excellent conversation regarding whether the US Public Access Program was a big success or big work in progress. Click this link for thoughts from you, Alicia Wise, Angela Cochran, Robert Kiley, Rick Anderson, Ivy Anderson, Scott Delman, Susan Fitzpatrick, Stuart Taylor, Andrew Tein, Mike Taylor, and Marcus Banks: DOE: The Grand Compromise of U.S. Public Access Programs: Going Green (google.com) (start from the top and work down).

--
As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osi2016-25/DF509FFC-940B-41F1-88ED-93A045CA911A%40craigellachie.us.

[David Wojick]

Yes but here we have a substantial new body of thought on OA. I did not mean to focus on the public access issue, hence my subject line.

David

On May 17, 2022, at 11:19 AM, Glenn Hampson <gham...@nationalscience.org> wrote:



To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osi2016-25/BN6PR1701MB1732FD3CA68335F31DA02162C5CE9%40BN6PR1701MB1732.namprd17.prod.outlook.com.