Yep---bias, and also more “trespassing” as well. These types of analyses have been done by folks with a better grasp of the complexity of this landscape (no offense to the analysis itself, just the foundation). Eric Archambault’s work, for example, has been (I think) the category killer here. The main problem is indexing. Scopus is a relatively small subset of the journal universe, mostly cataloging Western & English-only journals. When you look at the broader journal universe, like Eric (and others) do in their work, you get figures like these (as republished in our various issue and policy briefs)---see below. The overall conclusion is correct, though---only a small fraction of the highest-impact journals are fully OA, and there is wide variation in OA by region, discipline, etc.
As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osi2016-25/19D7A111-F747-4E38-A305-F5AE61AA9D1C%40craigellachie.us.