A Framework for (oscillatorsubstance-theory@googlegroups.com)
Dean Sinclair (Google Drive)
This is the paper that was published on :Iinfinite Energy." in a very slighll differeent formatting. dls
 |
A Framework for |
Some Implications of the Oscillators-in-a-Substance Model
Dean LeRoy Sinclair (BA, MS, PhD)
The Oscillators in a Substance Model is a theoretical approach which seems to explain everything--except the fact of existence--which has been “hidden in plain sight,” for over a century. It has been obscured by the misinterpretation of the Michelson-Morley experiment
as proving that the “void” was empty space.
(This model might well have come into existence over a century ago had it been realized that the disturbances that we call “light” could be being carried by rotors in contact with one another and that the work of Max Planck could be used to futher define those rotors. Einstein made a couple of errors of judgment and the scientific community followed his lead.)
A summary statement for this model is, as follows: “All existence is considered as bening within a Substance/Substrate of unknown extent and undefined basic unit, which has the general characteristics of a chemical substance at its triple point. This Substance is organized into and/or controlled by oscillators of the family defined by the equation, m x r = h/c = r x m , with an inversion through the value defined by
(h/c)^ 0.5.
This square root of the ratio of Planck’s Constant to the Speed of Lght describes a hypothetical entity with a mass of about 4.7 x10^-19 grams and a radius of about 4.7 x 10^-19 cm, This entity would be the average size of the oscillators of our existence, and represents an average mass value.
This model has many implications in physics theory. One is that what we consider as the rest mass, is apparently a minimal pressure against the rest of existence exerted at the maximal radius of the oscillator. This maximum radius turns out to be in the literature as the “Compton Wavelength,” for many units. The probable other limit, of mximum pressure at minimal radius, can be estimated by reversing the absolute values.
This approach leads to the interesting conclusion that the electron has limits such that it will, in a single inversion /rotation/inversion of rotation cycle be able to pass not only through and into an atomic nucleus but actually far inside of a proton or neutron.
u
The electron and anti-electron appear to be interconvertible. Also, the idea of matter and anti-matter being annihilated appears to be a situation of an electron/anti-electron pair reaching an exact alignment such as to combine to a previously unsuspected parent unit, which may be the ubiquitous unit of the void. A unit possibly distortable to the neutron by shock wave events. Considered this way, this unit, dubbed by this writer, the “Zerotron.” would be, in effect, the parent unit of all “Matter.”
[Experimentalists need to be aware of this probable, ubiquitous denizen of the “Null Set.” in any work. Especially if their work will in any way cause a shock wave, resulting in a possible neutron burst.... The radiation sickness reported by leClaire as a result of one of his experiments with cavitation collapse may well be an example of being unaware of this factor.
It seems probable that while stars are converting Hydrogen through a number of steps to Iron, they are also converting more Zerotrons to neutrons, hence, ultimately
furnishing more Hydrogen to burn.
It might be interesting to check to see if such simple shock-wave producing acts as an electrical discharge in a vacuum and striking an anvil with a hammer would produce some neutrons.]
The pressure of the ‘Units of the Void” on the comparatively infinitesimal amount of itself which we know as “Matter” is the “one force which is its own equal and opposite.” That is there is always a pressure toward equalizing motion throughout existence. On a localized level, this pressure is felt as a push toward a common center of least net motion. The commonest manifestation of this we call “Gravity,” which is usually considered as an attraction between matter units. This mathematical description works well, except at the limit. At the limit, the pushing-together concept reaches a balance. The “pull together” formulation, however, implies an infinitely deep hole.
[This error in the concept of Gravity causes the Black Hole Misconception of the astronomers. There is nothing wrong with their data. They need to switch their view of Gravity from a “pulling together” to a “pushing together” to understand why they cannot find “the huge matter object that ‘should be there.’”]
The realization that Matter is but an almost infinitesimal part of all that exists, as well as the realization that what we consider as the rest mass of a unit is a tiny fraction of the average mass accounts for a number of “Inexplicable mysteries,” e.g,. “ black matter,” and “black energy.” Energy, in this model, is another name for a packet of motion. Mass is the name for the accumulated pressure effects of the motions within a susrface as expressed against the rest of existence at a point on that surface. It is usually measured by comparison to some “standard.” Energy--usually meaning the motion effects observed when moving units collide--is measured by collision effects......
Charge is defined in ths model as the observed manifestation of the residual rotation associated with one of the vortex oscillators forms. A net counter-clockwise residual effect is probably the “negative charge” associated with electrons. A net clockwise rotation would be a positive charge.
It may be noted that while charges are associated with an individual unit, the effects that we see and attribute to the individual units are effects of huge numbers of units together. At the level of individual units or small groups of units the situation is somewhat different. There is evidence that electrons pair, and there is no reason to think protons do not pair, also. The positronium unit may be essentially the same as the electron pair noted for molecules. except that, on the molecular level, or even the atomic level, interaction with other units prevents the perfect alignment that would allow the ultimate combination called “annihilation.”
By this model, it appears that people, with the equipment to do so, could start with electrons and by a progressive acceleration in an electromagnetic field, follow “Steps of Evolution” as some of these electrons changed into “anti-electrons,” protons, anti-protons, muons and antimuons, zeta particle etc as the “electron” units were alternately accelerated and compressed (“increased in mass”) by interaction with the field which would have a constant rotational aspect.This constant rotational aspect would have, alternately directional acceleration and compression effects on the electron-antielectron moiety during its rotation/inversion cycle Tracking should show signals attributahle to the anti=electron, the Positronium Unit in its two forms, some “Annihilation radiation,” signals for a proton, then the anti-proton, their combination to a “positronium analog,” etc. The situation becoming more and more complicated as the “acceleration pressure” increases.
The seekers for the Higgs Boson, who started at the ”proton” level may have come close to producing the “idealized average unit” which would be supposedly reached at an ultimate compression to the inversion value of (h/c)^0.5.
In a sense, as the central,average unit in this model, this central unit has the same effect of “Supplying Gravity,” to the Substance of Existence as the Higgs Boson does to the more fanciful Standard Model Set of Units. (The supposed evidence for Quarks may arise from a misinterpretation of the three likely scattering nodes of the electron...)
as Aero-space engineers probably have been aware since about the 1940s that the limit of
“c” for any vectorial velocity-- incorporated through Minkowski Space into Einstein’s Space-Time Model--was in error. It appears to be somewhat more than a rumor that “hyper-light drives” have been known for some time, but serious navigation and communication problems exist.
Since a message takes up a finite portion of a carrier wave, it can be shown that, for an intelligent message to be transmitted and received, the fastest possible relative velocity between the transmitter and receiver pair is 0.7..(0.5^0.5) of the carrier-wave velocity. [This is for a transmitter reciver pair in orbit to one another..For other situations the problem appears at about half the carrier wave velocity or even less.]
It may be, however, that there have been drives operating at about 0.2c for some time. These drives--apparently utilizing super-conduction at space temperatures--would be fast enough to make trips to check on a Mars Base reasonably feasible; but, would still be slow enough to utilize electronic technology for communication and control. .
The model suggests the possibility of molding super conducteurs into forms rather than needing to do windings. It is possible, for instance, that a left-handed Mobius Strip of super-conductor--mounted correctly with respect to a permanent magnet in a “vacuum--” could be used to “extract energy from the void.” A Mobius Rim (a double-sided Mobus Strip made by twisting twice in the came direction before pasting the ends together and then turning it inside out) might work even better. Possibly the developing Graphene Technology could be pertinent....
All Matter units may originate from the “Zerotron” unit which arises from the combination of the electron form and the anti-electron form into a single oscillator. This is a process which as been erroneously called “annihilation” . A shock wave could distort this oscillator to the neutron which subsequently collapses to the electron and proton. These recombine into Hydrogen atoms. Further elements may be built up from pressure effects on what we would call “Diatomic Molecular Cations.”
Examples would be, HH+ compressed to D+, DD+ to He4+. and DH+ to T+. This last unit, the Tritium Cation, appears to be interconvertible to the isomeric Helium Three Cation, He3+.
It can be shown, mathematically, that any isotope above He4 may be considered as made up of combinations of D. T and He3 Units. Also, it appears that most, if not all, Beta Particle Emission, both negative and positive, and ”K-capture” changes, are explainable by T to He3 interconversions within atoms.
This suggests that those radioactive decay processes mentioned above, may be through a mono-cation species and that radiochemists may find that half-lives can be influenced by chemical environment. The instability of the Be8 unit, t imay not be of the Be8 atom as a neutral unit but of the Be8++, dication, whcn is a perfect “set-up” to split into the units of He4 and “Anti-Alpha,” or ”Anti-Helium 4,” and Alpha Particles.
[We probably should not consider the Alpha Particle as a He4 Nucleus but as a quite stable unit containing 6/8 of the He4 atom.]
Many of the ideas of molecular chemistry may apply to atoms. For instance, the idea of “resonance stabilization,” from organic chemistry, fits well with the stability of the Alpha particle as a “Square planar array.” Alpha emission may be a function of the dication form of the emitting unit....Analysis of atoms from the view of internal units, or possible units-- including T, He3. D and Be8-- may be useful in correlating the various breakdown patterns of radioactive atoms.
The Basic Force as an all-surrounding pressure, pushes interest at the atomic level toward the ideal of spherical symmetry. Anything that interferes with the nearly spherical symmetry of a diatomci unit, e.g. , HH, ,msy cause iti to tumble or spin erracticaly, This type if motion allows loss of “vib-rot energy” to the milieu and compression toward a spherical, atomic form. It may be that HH need only go to a triplet state to start the compression to D.
(The Deuterium Atom may be considered as a close analogue of a triplet state.)
If this be true, it may be possible to cause the transformation of HH to D by the use of light of an appropriate frequency. The same would hold for DD to He4. However, it would seem that a DD+, cation would not be difficult to induce.in the same way. This cation could possibly change to He4+ more easily than could the excited, but unionized, and hence more complex, triplet state to He4.
This idea of varying stabilities of ionic states and the possible change of diatomic ions to the monatomic forms suggests that there may be an interesting cycle going on in suns on their way from He4 to C12. One probable intermediate is Be8 which we have mentioned before as probably breaking dpwn through the dication. iIt is possible to write an interesting sequence of reactions running a cycle arround and around among the Alpha Particle, Hel’um Four and the Be8 ions which could continue indefinitely until broken up by an interfering reaction leading to C12. This “Chemical Perpetual Motion Machine” would be actually
“extracting energy from the surrounding void.” If the postulation be valid, it would be interesting to try to “bring it down to Earth.” Very cautiously!
The area known as “Cold Fusion “ which concerns the transformations at the sub atomic level that wican occur under less tha the highly “energetic“ conditions of plasma fusion, would seem to benefit from the ideas of this simple approach. The “One Force” is going to be most noticeable at the surface of a unit, where the inbalance of motion will be the greatext.
In the situation of the formation of He4 on the surfaces of Palladium electrodes, it would appear that the saturation of the Palladium with Deuterium, probably as DD molecules, would furnish a constant feed of DD to a surface layer, where the DD molecules would be available to enter into a chain reaction situation if some unit could be produced to initiate the chain.
A DD+ unit could be produced by a number of possible initiating conditions. Two of these are the presence of an Alpha emitter and light of a sufficiently high frequency. Other possible initiators would be a polarity reversing pulse, and contaminants having initiating ability. A possibility that comes to mind is Magnetite, Ferrous Ferric Oxide--quite stable and magnetic.
By the above view, electrolysis furnishes the Deuterium but may not be necessary to the further processes. It would appear that it be possible to produce the Deuterium elsewhere and have the reactiion take place on dryk catalytic surfaces. In the ultimate, one might visualize a reactor consiting of chamber wherein simphe HH were tranformed on one catalytic surface to DD which in another chamber would be transformed to He4, IF the speculation of there being a possible He4 to Be8 and back “chemical perpetual motion machine” were to be shown to be true, then He4 would be used in a separate reactor to “extract heat from the void.”
(Some people are bothered by the lack of observation in “:Cold Fusion” work of The various electromagnetic emissions that are associated with “nuclear” reactions, i.e. the emissions that are usually associated with the formation or transformation of atoms. One factor overlooked is that the possible range of frequencies of our universe may run from a high frequency cut-off of “1/h” to a frequency of “ch” at the low end. Both of these are many orders of magniture from the limited range which we can detect.)
.....
The basic equation which arises from setting Planck’s Constant equal to its definition as an angular momentum and assuming that the average tangential velocity is the Speed of Light, “c.” is “m x r i= h/c.” This little equation, which starts from the same basic information as do quantum Mechanics and Space-Time, seems to be somewhat more inclusive than its better known “relatives.”
In the expaned form of the m x r = h/c equation which is used in the basic information of the Oscillators-in-a-Substance Model, which is, asfollows:
lAml x lBrl = lABmrl=lh/cl = lBml x lArl
--where lAl is the absolute numerical value of the rest mass of a particular oscillator in the cgs system, and lBl is the absolute numerical value of the corresponding Compton Wavelength in the same system--the equation could give rise to a new field of mathematical research dealing with the interaction and packing of the two different “size” vortex oscillators known as “electrons” and “protons.” A “packing” which gives rise to the portion of reality which we call “Matter.”
The use of absolute numbers avoids the problems inherent to the usual convention of a number being “positive” if there be no designated sign. That convention accidentally places most mathematial calculations in the rignt-upper-forward octant of a Cartesian-coordinate system. A mathematical model of an oscillator, however, is not compatible with the use of but one part of the available “mathematical space.” Hence the use of absolute values, with the equals sign representing balance as well as mathematical equality.
The implied “Theorem” used in “O/S” to determine the second (high mass/small radius) limit for oscillators and the inversion values could be stated as follows: “If there can be found in nature a relationship of the form xy=K-- one may postulate that there is a reciprocal relationship wherein the absolute coefficients of x and y may be interchanged within the units system being utilized. Additionally there will be a set of values corresponding to the square root of the absolute value of K which will correspond to the inversion values of an oscillator.“ Several interesting ideas arise.
One of these ideas starts from the fact that “c,” the Speed of Light, is defined as “wavelength times frequency, c=hNu”. By the abpve theorem, “c” could be considered the constant, K, of a set of oscillators which would show, with separation from the transmitter, a continuing red shilft for initial broadcast frequencies above the value corresponding to the frequency-wavelength defined by “c^0.5.” This would be expected.
However, this theorem suggests the surprising idea that frequencies below the above square root values would show a continuing blue shift with distance, which seems totally contrary to logic. In, addition, it suggests that there would be a frequency/wavelength corresponding exactly to “c^0.5” which would be stable over distance! As this frequency happens to be within a range which can be studied--it is about 173 kilocycles/sec.There could be some sort of a possibly utilizable “motion equilibrium” at ths value.
These are some of the implications of the “O/S” model. For more information you may contact hugh...@gmail.com , phone 1-605-290-2154; or mail Dean Sinclair, 221 Eighth Ave.SE, Apt. 7, Aberdeen, South Dakota, SD57401-6173-07 United States of America.
(Much of the literature dealing with the development of this model during the period of 2008-2011 is collected on the Google Group, “Oscillator/Substance Theory.”)
| Google Drive: create, share, and keep all your stuff in one place. |  |