LComment on Schroedinger Equatiion, Also. Happy New Year

1 view
Skip to first unread message

dean sinclair

unread,
Dec 30, 2010, 3:21:52 PM12/30/10
to oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com
Here is  my " take" on the  Schroedinger Equation, the basis of Quantum Mechanics.
 
The first element of the Equation notes a wave function involving the second derivative with respect to time , apparently of Kinetic Energy.  The first derivative of Kinetic Energy is Momentum,, and the second derivative, the differential of momentum, would be either velocity or mass, whichever one wished to consider as being a constant. The integrations which would result from working with the second derivatives along the x, y , z coordinates of the basic "Energy Wave " considered in the mathematical conventions of positive numbers with Cartesian Coordinates, when followed logically, describe only one type of unit, albeit in ten dimensions;
 [Each double integration adds three dimensions, doing this three times gives nine dimensions, and the combination of the right, up, forward, "positive numbers" conventions adds a counter clockwise twist to the whole thing which adds a tenth dimension of counter clockwise spin. :This could be the general basis for the String theorists idea that the strings slapper into a then d-dimensional hole at 10I^-18 cm. which would be about the 4.7 x 10^-19 radius which our speculations suggests is the average diameter of the oscillators of our universe..}

This creates a "picture of a model" which is rotating counter clockwise into the octant to the right, up and forward from the chosen origin, So, right at the start, The Wave Function, in this view,   is covering only 10/80 of the dimensions of reality, we can go on doubling up, clockwise instead of counter-clockwise, in rather than out, integrating with velocity constant rather than mass, I think I'm up to ten out of 640 at this point, and,l think that I could double up a couple of more times, .In other words, If Schroedinger's Equation be valid as a descriptor, it is of a very limited view of the possibilities.
 
Anybody out there who is a QM expert, I'd like to hear your comments. 
 
Some ideas for projects, resolutions for this group for 20ll.... 
1. Get this thing some publicity so it will get checked out more widely... Write a short book? 
2. Fit the  "baryons" etc. for the "Standard Model, Atom Smashing work in ...
3. Extend model beyond Chem. and Physics into Cosmology....
4..Accomplish what we can ala the Serenity Prayer.  as applied to this stuff!     
 
Happy New Year, Prospero Ano  Novo, etc.   Eski 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages