BAEconstant//Planck'sConstantRevised

[Jack O Suileabhain]

*Respectfully submitted to Dean L. Sinclair & Oscillator-Substance Theory Group*

Author:  Jack O'Suileabhain/O'Sullivan-

For formal submission to: Max Planck Institute--> M...@Mpe.mpg.de <&> Re...@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de <&>Oscillator-Substance-Theory group <&> vort...@eskimo.com <-- From Jack O'Suileabhain(eng."O'Sullivan) aka Jack 'Harbach' O'Sullivan


**************** Planck's Constant Revised *******************


* * * Postulated necessary Planck revisions per extending fixed-definition-status to the value of 'E'-energy relative to Planck's-Constant's values for all subsequent international quantum-mechanics calculations hense forth* * *

 
Purpose of Paper:  Introduction of a Seminal-alternate-Concept of defining newly a 'Fixed Universal Quantum for all quantum-mechanics calculations for 'E' as for 'energy' as a fixed-universal-constant and newly minting this concept as the 'BAE-Constant' while specifically 'not' altering the contextual basis of Max Planck's constant; re: The Planck-Einstein-Dirac constant.  
 
Rather; this paper is in extended support of the Planck's-Constant and 'not' in refutation of 'Planck-Einstein-Dirac' in any regard.  In light of the purposed fixed-universal-value new definition of 'E' I will posit an alternative formula-revision of Einstein's classic E=MC^2quared to solve for 'M'ass @ M=EC2quared.  And this is also 'not' intended to alter Einstein but rather restate Einstein's formula(Einstein's-Constant) only in terms of the newly proposed assignment of said "universal fixed-quantum-formula-value for 'E.' "  And further:  I propose that the fixed-value of posited AExo-DarkSpace-ergo-DarkEnergy as AE=EC^3ubed in light of the proposed fixed-quantum designation for the value expressed as the BAE-Constant of 'E,' aka the Base-Ambient-Constant of Energy.
 
This proposed conversion renders the classic Planck's-Constant E=hv to EC=hv as changed by the fixed definition of 'E'nergy to be here-forward expressed as the 'BAE-Constant' fixed-base-energy-value of Interstellar Space.  Specifically the posit here is that there is a 'lowest-base-ambient-energy-density-level' to Interstellar Space; and below which that energy level cannot fall.  The theory for this is that the quasi-static-energy-tension of our Universe mandates & sustains that BAE-Constant.  And this is because our Universe is a relatively-low-energy-density bubble within a larger/virtually infinite DarkEnergy Aexo-space.  And this AExo-DarkSpace exists at it's own Base-Ambient-Energy-Density-Level again of AE=EC^3ubed and maintains the gravitational tensor-outpull upon our bubble universe.  (Note: A sub-posit to this is that AE=EC^3ubed also describeds the nexial energy level of a black-hole-singularity ingress point into parallel Aexo-DarkSpace as is also at the outer fringe-border of our bubble universe with Aexo-DarkSpace)
 
 
Posit:  There can be 'no total energy vacuum' that can exlude the density-field of energy below the BAE-Constant within our universe.  And this is because the DarkSpace tensor-outpull tends to want to inexorably actually accelerate outward to itself all lower density objects & energy wave-forms than it's own original AE=EC^3ubed base-ambient-energy-density-level, again, outward back into itself as a fluid dynamic flow system.  Hubble clearly observes & articulates that inexorable outward acceleration of galaxies/mass/energy flow to the outer diameter-border of our bubble universe.  And that border is the point where mass @ EC^2quared has accelerated x 'C' light speed and reaches the DarkSpace ingress energy thresh-hole of AE=EC^3ubed.
 
The rest of this paper attempts to provide theoretical proofs of the above based upon a revised- Planck's constant of (Photon= E=hv--->to---> BAE-Constant @ E therefore Photon=E @ 'C'-light-speed= (EC=hv) as Planck's revision.  And this will perforce also revise Einstein's Constant @ E=MC^2quared to M=EC^2quared (to be demonstrated following).

Whereas Max Planck posited that certain discreet quanta cannot take on Indescriminate-Values herein I extend that same premise to newly quantafying the value of 'E'nergy as pertains to quantum-mechanics.  Thusly from here forth 'E' is to be held constant at a 'fixed-value' that I will attempt to define & quantafy by the Planck-Einstein constant.  Here after I will refer to the fixed-value of 'E' regularly as the BAE-Constant.

Supporting Premise:  The Dirac-Constant rather straight-forwardly describes 'Light' as 'Helicoid-Wave-String'  enter:----> Photon 'E'nergy = h/2pi x w =  hv<---  (h= MPconstant & w=angular frequency & v=electro-magnetic frequency ) eg. the double radii 2pi a la' Dirac indicates circular diameter/wave-spin/wave-twist etc.)--->ergo---> Light as Helicoid-Wave-String a la' Dirac & a la' Planck.
 
Subsequently a Photon per duel particle/wavicle characteristic would logically= 1-wave-crest to 1-'Dirac-full-twist/spyro-loop'-wave-crest of afore-said 'Helicoid-wave-String.'   And classically the Planck-Constant writes that as 1-Photon's energy-'E'= hv.
 
Central Key argument per the logic of Max Planck:  Pragmatically 'E' must equal some 'constant' based upon the Planck-Einstein Constant rather than 'E' being merely a generically descriptive term merely in indication of the variously calculated sums of 'whole-quantum-energy' of sub-atomic particles &/or wave values in general terms.  To my mind that seems somewhat slip-shod 'not' to narrowly define 'E' in very specific fixed-quantum-value terms that would be universally-constant in all quantum-mechanics equations.
 
Max Planck's Constant is classically defining the 'E'-energy of a photon within light-wave-string obviously at 'light-speed' ergo E=hv.  The problem here that 'C'-light-speed is 'not' an irrevocable constant-speed as regards to the fiction of 'the vacuum of space.'  There is no-such-state as a complete energy vacuum.  And 'space' relative density is compromised through gravitational warp-density rendering the idea of a 'Light Speed Constant' to be a defacto fiction relative to gravitational space-density stressors constantly impinging upon light's trajectory & drag vs speed.  Hense the original proofs to Einstein's theory which perforce validated General Relativity etc.
 
There is difficulty here  unless we define the ultimate base-constant of 'Light-Speed' by defining 'Light Speed' at a 'Fixed-Base-Ambient-Insterstellar-Space-Energy-density level' that cannot be further reduced because of the dynamic-quasi-static-tension of the Surrounding DarkEnergy gravitational out-pull-stressors upon our space-time-normal energy sheet within our bubble-space-time variable-normal universe. Then the relative interactive interchangeability of our various quantum mechanics experimental findings will not lack accuracy & therefore will not lack functional empiric validity.  There are discoveries that we are missing by not establishing the BAE-Constant for 'E'-energy.
 
Accordingly then this modifies the Planck-Constant as follows: Logically then using 'E' as the fixed-quantum of the Base-Ambient-Energy Constant/BAE-Constant we can define Light Wave Photon energy-density simply as BAE-Constant 'E' x 'C' light-speed= Photon-energy-density.  And so this concept simply converts the Planck-Constant Photon energy definition from  E = hv --> to --> EC=hv.
 
And as follows relative to the Planck-Einstein-Constant this new fixed-quantum-definition of 'E' as the Base-Ambient-Interstellar-Space energy-density level expresses 'E' per 'Planck' as----> E=hv/C


Review revisions: 
 
*Re:  'E' = BAE-Constant = hv/C
 
*Re:  Planck's-Constant = 1-Photon = EC = hv
 
*Re:  Mass of 1'H'-hydrogen= EC^2quared = hv^2quared = (M=EC^2quared)
 
*Re:  AExo-DarkSpace = DarkEnergy = EC^3ubed = hv^3ubed = (AE=hv^3ubed=EC^3ubed)
 
Recap:  Planck Revised-->Photon= BAE-Constant @ Light-Speed
 
Old Planck-->Photon= E=hv----->Revised Planck----> EC=hv
 
Therefore BAE = E = hv/C
 
If then Einstein Revised says M=EC^2quared
 
then also E = M/C^2quared
 
then also hv/C = M/C^2quared
 
therefore hv = M/C

and also again hv=EC 

therefore {hv} x C = M  which is also neatly  ({hv} x C = EC^2quared) =   (M=EC^2quared)
 
and again said Revised Planck says Photon= EC=hv  because new BAE-Constant = E making Photon=E@C-light speed
 
therefore as before revised Einstein says M=EC x C which also = M = hv x C which also = M=EC^squared which thusly becomes Revised Einstein per Revised Planck's-Constant per reassignment of the postulated 'now'  fixed-universal-constant value for 'E'-energy as the BAE-Constant aka Base Ambient Energy universal-fixed Constant.
 
Again-------> M=EC^2quared  which is equal to ---> {hv} x C = M
 
And again Planck revised restates Photon=> EC=hv  aka BAE-Constant of 'E' x C-lightspeed = EC=hv.
 
 
*Conclusional Postulate:  Light Speed-'C' can only correctly be stated as an universal constant in the context of 'E'-energy being also stated as a fixed-universal-constant; and this within the further framework of a revisional re-expression of the Planck's Constant which in turn simultaneously revises Einstein's-Constant equation relative to
the relationship of Mass to Energy to Light-Speed.
 
In short these revisions are stated:  From E=hv  --->to--->  EC=hv  as the Revised Max Planck's Constant---->&>
which mandates, proves & articulates the Einstein Revision>  From E=MC^2quared -->to--> M=EC^2quared  perforce.

Thankyou: Jack O'Suileabhain/O'Sullivan

---

Keep your friends updated— even when you’re not signed in.

[ESKI]

Jack:
Welcome to the group. However, how about as little more basic infor as
to why you are doing this revision, and what the meaning is? Most of
us are not experts on on Quantum Gravity and such.
In fact, I have doubts about both terms being used together having
any meaning what so ever. So how about an explanation in "lay-man's
language" that this stupid old duffer might understand? Eh?
Dean Sinclair

On Oct 25, 9:42 am, Jack O Suileabhain <braghgoerin...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> *Respectfully submitted to Dean L. Sinclair & Oscillator-Substance Theory Group*
>
> Author:  Jack O'Suileabhain/O'Sullivan-
>

> For formal submission to: Max Planck Institute--> M...@Mpe.mpg.de <&> R...@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de <&>Oscillator-Substance-Theory group <&> vorte...@eskimo.com <-- From Jack O'Suileabhain(eng."O'Sullivan) aka Jack 'Harbach' O'Sullivan

> _________________________________________________________________
> Keep your friends updated—even when you’re not signed in.http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-act...

[ESKI]

More comment on the original post. Basic energy level.:...Outer space
seems to have a basic Energy, at least translational energy. as
measured by temlperature. at about 2.7 degrees Kelvin.

LIght as a "heliocord etc.: Light tranvels along a line hence could
be called a "string" or a cord. As there will be a spin, one can call
this spin a helix, actually it is usually an expanding helix, so that
could be a Helicord..

Yes, our universe is almost surely a tiny part of "Whatever Is" hence
a bubble.

As to revising Planck's constant to a Basic Energy Constant. I guees
this would fall under the fact that any mukltiple, power or root of a
constant, or combination of constants can be considered another
constant, which may, or may not be of practical value..... ESKI

> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -