Matter-Anti-matter Annihilation
14 views
Skip to first unread message
ESKI
Jul 27, 2010, 4:32:59 PM7/27/10
to Oscillator/Substance Theory
Hi, everybody,
I have a question that I need an answer for, It is:. IS THERE
ACTUALLY, ANYWHERE, A VERIFIABLE CASE OF MATTER-ANTI-MATTER
ANNIHILATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE hYDROGEN ATOM OR ABOVE?
It seems to be dogma that "Matter" and "Anti-matter" annihilate on
contact to revert to pure "Energy."
Our work suggests that this is nonsense, and in fact, "Matter{,as we
know it, is made up to a great extent of a unit, the electron, and
another unit, the proton, which could be considered as, respectively,
"matter" and "anti-matter" units by a logic which I have outlined
elsewhere. In fact, there seems to be evidence developing that the
"nuetron count" of an atom is actually a count of the number of
nucleons which are at any given instant in a
state of "anti-electron, anti-proton" i.e. an "Anti-matter state."
By this view, everything is made up of a balance of what we consider
as "Matter," (electrons and protons) and Anti-matter (anti-electrons
and anti-protons.)
The point is that I can't find a thing in the literature of a true
case of matter-anti-matter annihihaation other than the known electron-
anti-electron situation which , aat least by my reasoning, is a
combination "reaction" to form another ocsillator rather than a
distruction to wave motion (electromagnetic radiation.)
IF SOME ONE HAS THE TIME, COULD THEY DO A LITERATURE SEARCH ON ANTI-
MATTTER AND SEE IF, ANWHERE, THERE IS A VERIFIABLE CASE OF ACTUAL
"MATTER-ANTI-MATTER ANNIHILATION' FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE ELECTRON-
ANTI-ELECTRON CASE? On a quick scan, I could find nothing....
seems to me this might make a basis for a good science article for
some aspiring wirter, with a title something like "Anti-Matter
Myths..."
Thanks, Dean (Eski)
I have a question that I need an answer for, It is:. IS THERE
ACTUALLY, ANYWHERE, A VERIFIABLE CASE OF MATTER-ANTI-MATTER
ANNIHILATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE hYDROGEN ATOM OR ABOVE?
It seems to be dogma that "Matter" and "Anti-matter" annihilate on
contact to revert to pure "Energy."
Our work suggests that this is nonsense, and in fact, "Matter{,as we
know it, is made up to a great extent of a unit, the electron, and
another unit, the proton, which could be considered as, respectively,
"matter" and "anti-matter" units by a logic which I have outlined
elsewhere. In fact, there seems to be evidence developing that the
"nuetron count" of an atom is actually a count of the number of
nucleons which are at any given instant in a
state of "anti-electron, anti-proton" i.e. an "Anti-matter state."
By this view, everything is made up of a balance of what we consider
as "Matter," (electrons and protons) and Anti-matter (anti-electrons
and anti-protons.)
The point is that I can't find a thing in the literature of a true
case of matter-anti-matter annihihaation other than the known electron-
anti-electron situation which , aat least by my reasoning, is a
combination "reaction" to form another ocsillator rather than a
distruction to wave motion (electromagnetic radiation.)
IF SOME ONE HAS THE TIME, COULD THEY DO A LITERATURE SEARCH ON ANTI-
MATTTER AND SEE IF, ANWHERE, THERE IS A VERIFIABLE CASE OF ACTUAL
"MATTER-ANTI-MATTER ANNIHILATION' FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE ELECTRON-
ANTI-ELECTRON CASE? On a quick scan, I could find nothing....
seems to me this might make a basis for a good science article for
some aspiring wirter, with a title something like "Anti-Matter
Myths..."
Thanks, Dean (Eski)
ESKI
Jul 27, 2010, 4:33:01 PM7/27/10
to Oscillator/Substance Theory
Jack O Suileabhain
Jul 28, 2010, 7:23:38 PM7/28/10
to oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com, deanls...@gmail.com
DEAN you KILLJOY(not)~;-) Hey; If we blow the 'anti-matter' cover then Star-Trek get's CANCELED. . .
AND: Aren't the super-colliders racing a micro-thimble's worth of Anti-Matter around the track so that a virtual ARMY of
ping-pong playing & tenured physicists can maintain their credentials and PAYCHECKS? Mostly this is an elaborate & intentional 'campaign of disinformation; methinks.'
HEISENBURG'S 'Uncertainty' is having big-play in this global CHARADE; now you see the wee lil' Anti-Matter(s) & Now you DON'T.
MOSTLY-------> It's never been anything but DON'T.
When Galaxies (Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass bodies with Singularity Centres-balanced 'grey-holes') reach light-speed at the Universe-bubble border
their respective hub-grey-hole singularity centres dialate to BLACK-HOLE status at the AexoDarkEnergy-Hyperspace frontier and to the fanfare of MEGA-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTERS
are 'eaten' back into parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace.
Hadron-Cern copies the above process using super-energized-accelerated Protons aka (MICRO Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass with Singularity Centres-balanced (micro-grey-holes').
At the appropriate quasi-light-speed acceleration point the Proton-grey-hole-Centre dialates to MICRO-Black-Hole Status and SUCKS itself-shut to the fanfare of a MICRO-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTER(notable) energy release. . . . and this process is that which was touted as the FICTIONAL 'anti-matter-annihilation energy-release' phenomenon. But MUCH energy IS being released but NOT from fictional anti-matter-annihilation.
?Why does not said Micro-Black-Hole-Singularity EXPAND dangerously. EASY. The hugely-overwhelming proximal PLANETARY MASS-PROTON dynamic equilibrium simply SQUASHES-SHUT the Einstein-Rosen Micro-Black-Hole access to parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace. This could be the LAW of AETHYR-M-BRANE PROXIMAL ELECTRO-GRAVIONIC FIELD HYPER-TENSOR EQUILIBRIUM(especially near High-mass Bodies; like planets AND even being near a 'free-black-hole' the PROXIMAL M-BRANE TENSOR FIELD would 'preclude' any 'other' relatively 'near-by' singularity formation.)
EVEN the same parallel macro-phenomenon of a Fission-Bomb's Plasma-Gyro-Toroidal creates the 'micro-singularity-centre' which ingresses the classic INGRESS MUSHROOM PILLAR, which initiates a FUSION PILLAR within the FISSION RELEASE GYRO-TOROIDAL MAELSTROM. And even this notable (miniscule but relatively large/to-us) ingress of parallel-AexoDE-Hyperspace plasma is QUICKLY SQUASHED-SHUT by the Solar-System/Planetary Electro-Gravionic Field tension upon our immediately surround 'space-M-brane.'
LOS ALAMOS: Manhattan's 'Teller etc.' thought that the 'bomb's' reaction would 'cascade-open-exponentially' and consume the ENTIRE MASS OF THE EARTH and maybe the solar system.
But 'Singularity' is the MODEL & RULE of all 'Mass-Matter-Gyro-Toriodal' constructs in the Bubble-Universe which accounts for pretty-much EVERYTHING. And the natural M-Brane/Aether Electro-Gravionic super-tensor field-state STABILIZES this COSMIC/AEXOCOSMIC fluid-dynamic energy circulation SYSTEM.
So obviously the above HIGHLY FUNCTIONAL MODEL pretty much excludes the so-called anti-matter & thusly anti-matter annihilation-model.
And because of the above stated LAW of M-Brane FIELD-TENSOR Equilibrium the notion of MORONS that Cern-Hadron is 'creating' so-called DEADLY BLACK-HOLE is mostly BS.
HOWEVER: Being able to FIRE-DIRECT a stream of BLACK-HOLE STATE ACCELERATED PROTONS aka 'Micro-Black-Holes' is probably DOABLE & would make ONE HECK OF A POTENT WEAPON>(maybe already in existence)< Cheers Jack Harbach O'Sullivan~:-)
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:33:01 -0700
> Subject: Matter-Anti-matter Annihilation
> From: deanls...@gmail.com
> To: oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com
AND: Aren't the super-colliders racing a micro-thimble's worth of Anti-Matter around the track so that a virtual ARMY of
ping-pong playing & tenured physicists can maintain their credentials and PAYCHECKS? Mostly this is an elaborate & intentional 'campaign of disinformation; methinks.'
HEISENBURG'S 'Uncertainty' is having big-play in this global CHARADE; now you see the wee lil' Anti-Matter(s) & Now you DON'T.
MOSTLY-------> It's never been anything but DON'T.
When Galaxies (Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass bodies with Singularity Centres-balanced 'grey-holes') reach light-speed at the Universe-bubble border
their respective hub-grey-hole singularity centres dialate to BLACK-HOLE status at the AexoDarkEnergy-Hyperspace frontier and to the fanfare of MEGA-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTERS
are 'eaten' back into parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace.
Hadron-Cern copies the above process using super-energized-accelerated Protons aka (MICRO Gyro-Toroidal energy-mass with Singularity Centres-balanced (micro-grey-holes').
At the appropriate quasi-light-speed acceleration point the Proton-grey-hole-Centre dialates to MICRO-Black-Hole Status and SUCKS itself-shut to the fanfare of a MICRO-GAMMA-RAY-BURSTER(notable) energy release. . . . and this process is that which was touted as the FICTIONAL 'anti-matter-annihilation energy-release' phenomenon. But MUCH energy IS being released but NOT from fictional anti-matter-annihilation.
?Why does not said Micro-Black-Hole-Singularity EXPAND dangerously. EASY. The hugely-overwhelming proximal PLANETARY MASS-PROTON dynamic equilibrium simply SQUASHES-SHUT the Einstein-Rosen Micro-Black-Hole access to parallel-adjacent AexoDE-Hyperspace. This could be the LAW of AETHYR-M-BRANE PROXIMAL ELECTRO-GRAVIONIC FIELD HYPER-TENSOR EQUILIBRIUM(especially near High-mass Bodies; like planets AND even being near a 'free-black-hole' the PROXIMAL M-BRANE TENSOR FIELD would 'preclude' any 'other' relatively 'near-by' singularity formation.)
EVEN the same parallel macro-phenomenon of a Fission-Bomb's Plasma-Gyro-Toroidal creates the 'micro-singularity-centre' which ingresses the classic INGRESS MUSHROOM PILLAR, which initiates a FUSION PILLAR within the FISSION RELEASE GYRO-TOROIDAL MAELSTROM. And even this notable (miniscule but relatively large/to-us) ingress of parallel-AexoDE-Hyperspace plasma is QUICKLY SQUASHED-SHUT by the Solar-System/Planetary Electro-Gravionic Field tension upon our immediately surround 'space-M-brane.'
LOS ALAMOS: Manhattan's 'Teller etc.' thought that the 'bomb's' reaction would 'cascade-open-exponentially' and consume the ENTIRE MASS OF THE EARTH and maybe the solar system.
But 'Singularity' is the MODEL & RULE of all 'Mass-Matter-Gyro-Toriodal' constructs in the Bubble-Universe which accounts for pretty-much EVERYTHING. And the natural M-Brane/Aether Electro-Gravionic super-tensor field-state STABILIZES this COSMIC/AEXOCOSMIC fluid-dynamic energy circulation SYSTEM.
So obviously the above HIGHLY FUNCTIONAL MODEL pretty much excludes the so-called anti-matter & thusly anti-matter annihilation-model.
And because of the above stated LAW of M-Brane FIELD-TENSOR Equilibrium the notion of MORONS that Cern-Hadron is 'creating' so-called DEADLY BLACK-HOLE is mostly BS.
HOWEVER: Being able to FIRE-DIRECT a stream of BLACK-HOLE STATE ACCELERATED PROTONS aka 'Micro-Black-Holes' is probably DOABLE & would make ONE HECK OF A POTENT WEAPON>(maybe already in existence)< Cheers Jack Harbach O'Sullivan~:-)
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:33:01 -0700
> Subject: Matter-Anti-matter Annihilation
> From: deanls...@gmail.com
> To: oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Oscillator/Substance Theory" group.
> To post to this group, send email to oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oscillatorsubstance...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oscillatorsubstance-theory?hl=en.
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Oscillator/Substance Theory" group.
> To post to this group, send email to oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oscillatorsubstance...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oscillatorsubstance-theory?hl=en.
>
dean sinclair
Jul 28, 2010, 8:43:01 PM7/28/10
to oscillatorsub...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jack,
As usual, we seem pretty much in agreement, although, again. as usual, I don't quite understand your DeutscerTypeWordSprache.
The problem with the Hadron super-collider racing a pico-thimble full of anti-matter around is that the darn thing just can't "get off the ground." Odds are that it is broke down again, right now.
The idea that protons can be accelerated in the same way as the more massive units can is an error. Protons can, and do, associate with one another; and, to make it worse, the proton is an inverting oscillator which probably, under the right circumstances, can convert to an Anti-proton--think conversion of the Hydrogen Molecular Cation to the Deuteron--there are lots of things that can happen that the designers had no idea of..
.In the talk that I didn't get to give, i was going to note that there is a possibility that the Hadron Collider, while designed as a sophisticated particle accelerator may well be acting as a crude fusion reactor before feed-back causes it to break down....
The tenured professors may end up sweating a bit, if their jobs depend on the Hadron Collider finding the Higgs Boson....'Tain't gonna happen....
Apparently, you have no better luck finding any authentic Matter-Anti-matter Annihilation material than I did. Cheers, Dean
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Jack O Suileabhain <braghgo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DEAN you KILLJOY(not)~;-) Hey; If we blow the 'anti-matter' cover then Star-Trek get's CANCELED. . .
Horrors. But didn't Star Trek us DiLithium.....???
Message has been deleted
ka-sala
Aug 1, 2010, 2:26:12 AM8/1/10
to Oscillator/Substance Theory
QUOTE
> Myths..."
>
> Thanks, Dean (Eski)
Hello Eski,
I know of one writer who wrote about all of this; and I have to agree
with Jacko here, despite you say you find some of his language
'DeutscerTypeWordSprache'. a bit hard to understand. Yet he is right
when he says...
QUOTE
interest to you that in the beginning, '70's, was done in a form of
hieroglyphics for protection. So breaking this down into English, I
am the first to admit much of what I say goes over the heads, due to
reading it according to what only the theorists claim. When in fact,
it it given with a wisp of insight into whatever subject matter is
being discussed. Perhaps it is this 'wisps' you need?
This is one reason why this section of the already written book, is
written in such a way, that hopefully, the energy within this
potential you seek, will only be used for peaceful purposes. It seems
to be the disregard of a lot in science, to keep things that way, once
anything seen can be used otherwise.
There is no intention of mine in wanting anything out of this - except
an intelligent mind to understand - and to put it into practice. It is
simply being held back due to the unstable factor of greed, intentions
of self worth, and warfare. It is no myth Eski, far from it! It
would be an absolute waste of time spending a life-time of blood,
sweat and tears on a myth; only to find the warring nature of many
turn it back on their fellow man.
So it remains... always oscillating, until the receiver is worthy of
this knowledge. Being a receiver itself, it naturally transmits this
energy, and the whole intention is for the benefit of mankind to
utilize and not annihilate one another in their race to the top
without full knowledge of how.
It would be like letting loose the knowledge of what created the known
atomic bomb - despite all the good which has come out of nuclear
medicine - the facts remain they did not first know the potential
energy of what they still so ignorantly call 'waste'. Instead now the
damage done is too late in understanding, what could have been... in
place of it's radio-active harm. One should not open the doors to some
energies, without first understanding it is all worth-while when used
correctly. And when no harm can come upon the heads of any human
being.
NASA seeks to make their Lightships - prototypes - but they have a way
to go before understanding enough in the direction in which we speak.
Getting back to where we were at the time of the ' VigierVIITalk' -
and what didn't happen - what are you wanting further to bring this
together the way you wanted it to be? It appears you are still
searching for more ? Have you personally had any outside feedback re
as far as you got prepared for this? Is this the reason you now need
more, and why you need an answer by further searching...
asking, since you had it all ready to put forward?
Regards always,
ka-sala
PS. Don't overlook the WISP in Science Eski... I don't have the
Pleiades avatar for nothing. But NASA won't let me in! As they read
my report in the 80's... wouldn't it be an irony ? I have no proof
they copied nothing... when they had the lot!
> seems to me this might make a basis for a good science article for
> some aspiring writer, with a title something like "Anti-Matter
> Myths..."
>
> Thanks, Dean (Eski)
Hello Eski,
I know of one writer who wrote about all of this; and I have to agree
with Jacko here, despite you say you find some of his language
'DeutscerTypeWordSprache'. a bit hard to understand. Yet he is right
when he says...
QUOTE
>probably DOABLE & would make ONE HECK OF A POTENT WEAPON (maybe already in existence)<
Plus as you have said, some of mine is #@!!***( ....) which maybe of
interest to you that in the beginning, '70's, was done in a form of
hieroglyphics for protection. So breaking this down into English, I
am the first to admit much of what I say goes over the heads, due to
reading it according to what only the theorists claim. When in fact,
it it given with a wisp of insight into whatever subject matter is
being discussed. Perhaps it is this 'wisps' you need?
This is one reason why this section of the already written book, is
written in such a way, that hopefully, the energy within this
potential you seek, will only be used for peaceful purposes. It seems
to be the disregard of a lot in science, to keep things that way, once
anything seen can be used otherwise.
There is no intention of mine in wanting anything out of this - except
an intelligent mind to understand - and to put it into practice. It is
simply being held back due to the unstable factor of greed, intentions
of self worth, and warfare. It is no myth Eski, far from it! It
would be an absolute waste of time spending a life-time of blood,
sweat and tears on a myth; only to find the warring nature of many
turn it back on their fellow man.
So it remains... always oscillating, until the receiver is worthy of
this knowledge. Being a receiver itself, it naturally transmits this
energy, and the whole intention is for the benefit of mankind to
utilize and not annihilate one another in their race to the top
without full knowledge of how.
It would be like letting loose the knowledge of what created the known
atomic bomb - despite all the good which has come out of nuclear
medicine - the facts remain they did not first know the potential
energy of what they still so ignorantly call 'waste'. Instead now the
damage done is too late in understanding, what could have been... in
place of it's radio-active harm. One should not open the doors to some
energies, without first understanding it is all worth-while when used
correctly. And when no harm can come upon the heads of any human
being.
NASA seeks to make their Lightships - prototypes - but they have a way
to go before understanding enough in the direction in which we speak.
Getting back to where we were at the time of the ' VigierVIITalk' -
and what didn't happen - what are you wanting further to bring this
together the way you wanted it to be? It appears you are still
searching for more ? Have you personally had any outside feedback re
as far as you got prepared for this? Is this the reason you now need
more, and why you need an answer by further searching...
>A VERIFIABLE CASE OF MATTER-ANTI-MATTER
ANNIHILATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE hYDROGEN ATOM OR ABOVE? <
Where are your intentions of this O/S leading to? I guess I am
ANNIHILATION AT THE LEVEL OF THE hYDROGEN ATOM OR ABOVE? <
asking, since you had it all ready to put forward?
Regards always,
ka-sala
PS. Don't overlook the WISP in Science Eski... I don't have the
Pleiades avatar for nothing. But NASA won't let me in! As they read
my report in the 80's... wouldn't it be an irony ? I have no proof
they copied nothing... when they had the lot!
Message has been deleted
ESKI
Aug 3, 2010, 1:13:01 PM8/3/10
to Oscillator/Substance Theory
Ka-sala,
As always, you are apparently several steps--or is it light years ?--
ahead of this slow old man.Have to admit to being lost--again. Don't
recognize the acronym, WISP, and do not know about your Pleiades
Avatar and, somehow, what was your 80"s report slips my mind. Would
like to see what has been written about the myth of Anti-matter other
than my own little short article on Helium. I should check there for
the other articles on the same subject. Regards, "Eski"
As always, you are apparently several steps--or is it light years ?--
ahead of this slow old man.Have to admit to being lost--again. Don't
recognize the acronym, WISP, and do not know about your Pleiades
Avatar and, somehow, what was your 80"s report slips my mind. Would
like to see what has been written about the myth of Anti-matter other
than my own little short article on Helium. I should check there for
the other articles on the same subject. Regards, "Eski"
ka-sala
Aug 4, 2010, 8:22:52 AM8/4/10
to Oscillator/Substance Theory
http://www.sal.wisc.edu/WISP/
You might get through NASA's Link here...
https://dns.l4x.org/cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov
http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk/wisp_ch_7/wisp_ch_7.html
http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk/wisp_ch_5/wisp_ch_5.html
http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/212_fall2003.web.dir/tyler_freeman/modern.htm
http://www.hypergeometricaluniverse.com/?p=2893
Don't know if you can bring up this next
one!
Wisp Unification Theory - almost the theory of everything
http://www-public.jcu.edu.au/news/JCUPRD1_060264
Not intending to lose you Eski... Just a little food for thought to
add to the subjects within the Light which you seek. Or should I say
energy ?
Don't worry 'bout Pleiades... Just a starry Cosmological Link.
But I am serious...
Many have gone down in history as having 'lost it'... but there is
anti matter as equally as there is matter. It is no Myth! Just as
everything has an opposite. In O/S you are looking for this force.
Right from the start, I brought this in. Nothing can change this, but
minds can confuse it.
It's like there is Light and dark/black Light energies. Just because
it reaches into nanos and quantum's it's still there, as even
annihilation leaves something in it's wake... This is why I
mentioned the WISP (wisp) so lightly.
This link ties in with just the title alone.
'Antimatter Atoms could shed light on the universe.'
http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/2002-10-30-antimatter_x.htm
Draw from anything what you will Eski. I have never been one to
believe all theorists – just because it is written – or claimed (until
proven wrong.) I guess I have enough understanding to simply hold to
that... as I have all my life. And the same here is just as
applicable... Until proven wrong, I will just carry on.
It's very probable you have seen these sites, but then again, there
maybe just one small word which triggers your own search here.
Anything I say would not change where you are heading. I have been
there – in my way – and believe I have given it all in a nut shell,
and cannot take you further than you are, if you are not open to new
avenues.
I hope somewhere you can find more peace of mind within your
understanding. Not feel nor see yourself as some 'old man'... and
most of all, even think that some-one who may simply understand things
in a different yet realistic light, as not being light years ahead of
you, or any others. I just haven't waited this long for an intelligent
enough mind to grasp what I'm saying....
Quote. 'Truth is ever to be found in the simplicity, and not in the
multiplicity and confusion of things.'
*Izaac Newton
Regards until next time,
ka-sala
> > > Thanks, Dean (Eski)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
You might get through NASA's Link here...
https://dns.l4x.org/cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov
http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk/wisp_ch_7/wisp_ch_7.html
http://www.kevin.harkess.btinternet.co.uk/wisp_ch_5/wisp_ch_5.html
http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/212_fall2003.web.dir/tyler_freeman/modern.htm
http://www.hypergeometricaluniverse.com/?p=2893
Don't know if you can bring up this next
one!
Wisp Unification Theory - almost the theory of everything
http://www-public.jcu.edu.au/news/JCUPRD1_060264
Not intending to lose you Eski... Just a little food for thought to
add to the subjects within the Light which you seek. Or should I say
energy ?
Don't worry 'bout Pleiades... Just a starry Cosmological Link.
But I am serious...
Many have gone down in history as having 'lost it'... but there is
anti matter as equally as there is matter. It is no Myth! Just as
everything has an opposite. In O/S you are looking for this force.
Right from the start, I brought this in. Nothing can change this, but
minds can confuse it.
It's like there is Light and dark/black Light energies. Just because
it reaches into nanos and quantum's it's still there, as even
annihilation leaves something in it's wake... This is why I
mentioned the WISP (wisp) so lightly.
This link ties in with just the title alone.
'Antimatter Atoms could shed light on the universe.'
http://www.usatoday.com/news/science/2002-10-30-antimatter_x.htm
Draw from anything what you will Eski. I have never been one to
believe all theorists – just because it is written – or claimed (until
proven wrong.) I guess I have enough understanding to simply hold to
that... as I have all my life. And the same here is just as
applicable... Until proven wrong, I will just carry on.
It's very probable you have seen these sites, but then again, there
maybe just one small word which triggers your own search here.
Anything I say would not change where you are heading. I have been
there – in my way – and believe I have given it all in a nut shell,
and cannot take you further than you are, if you are not open to new
avenues.
I hope somewhere you can find more peace of mind within your
understanding. Not feel nor see yourself as some 'old man'... and
most of all, even think that some-one who may simply understand things
in a different yet realistic light, as not being light years ahead of
you, or any others. I just haven't waited this long for an intelligent
enough mind to grasp what I'm saying....
Quote. 'Truth is ever to be found in the simplicity, and not in the
multiplicity and confusion of things.'
*Izaac Newton
Regards until next time,
ka-sala
>
> - Show quoted text -
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages