Merry Christmas, Some Thoughts on Science Theory and an "Autographed Book Offer"

[Dean Sinclair]

Christmas and New Year’s greetings...

.
This is an end of the year greeting to the scientific community, and a few other friends, family and acquaintances--from an old, “Outside-the-box Crackpot--" consisting of some of his opinions/ideas, primarily about some bits of science theory..This is in no way ‘privileged communication” and I would be happy for it to be passed on to everyone’s nets for people's edification or amusement; however, they might see it.

Let’s do a take on the String Theorists, to the extreme, and assume that throughout Existence there is a continuing net of the vibrations that we see as electromagnetic waves, with a range of perhaps the high freqency of “1/h” to the low freqency of “ch” with an average frequency of “c^1/2”  which is some where around 173 kc/sec  

When we see a light wave it is a "disturbance in this net.”    \

Taking this one step further,  the Canadian Theorist, Al Zeeper, who shows that all the various “Energy equations” fit a common pattern--as they should, they all deal with Kinetic Energy--has published a little YouTube Video saying that Gravity is a pressure of photons.... If one takes his view (I totally agree that Gravity is a result of differential pressures in the Substance of Existence)--then we have an interesting correspondence to the work of Professor Higgs.  If we consider the “Substance of Existence” as essentially the same as a “Higgs Field,” then the average of the pressures exerted by this net of frequencies, would correspond to “a particle which gave gravity to everything else,” i.e., the “Higgs Boson.”   The Higgs, an imaginary particle, would have a real counterpart in the average frequency of our “Perceptual Universe” wherein “h” and “c” are valid constants ( presumably statistical averages.)  That is, the frequency noted above, the Square Root of “C.” the point where frequency and wavelength have the same absolute values.   

The Hadron Collider people are finding some signals that they think might be the “Higgs Particle.”  The Hadron, despite its theoretical base being in the “House of Cards” called the “Standard Model,” does seem to be functioning. To do so, protons have to be functioning in such a way that they can be cycled clockwise or counter-clockwise, apparently with about the same amount of energy expenditure each way, something not to be expected for rotating, inverting vortexes. That is, not, unless they are also undergoing inversion of rotation, such that the effects of vector velocity increase and compression (mass increase) are essentially the same whether  the overall direction of rotation of the stream is cw or ccw.  This fits with the idea that the proton, like the B-sub-s Meson alternates between “Matter and Anti-matter” states, with the “positive-proton --(actually Anti-matter, by at least one view)-state,”  having just enough predominance for the proton to be seen in our universe as “positively charged,” i.e. rotating c.w.?, for a slightly greater proportion of its cycle.

 Whichever way the  “proton/anti-proton entity" be spun in the “Collider Field” for half of the cycle it will be expected to increase vector velocity (Kinetic Energy) and for the other half of its cycle, will be compressed (attempted increase of speed of rotation, resulting in compression, seen as “increase of mass.” )   When the two streams are forced into “collision”  there are a number of interesting possibilities which do not seem to be mentioned by the scientists doing the experiments.


 One is that the proton and anti-proton are so closely related as to presumably be interchangeable under these drastic circumstances, and, therefore, can associate into “Hydrogen molecule/Hydrogen atom” analogs as do the electron/anti-electron in the formation of “Positronium.” 

A few “collisions,” instead of doing a simple bounce, or the “destruction” expected by the scientists, probably produce such associations, leading to a variety of products.  Associations  of “identical units” could, eventually “annihilate” producing from   p^+  +   p^-  ---> p^0 type reaction, the equivalent of the “Zerotron” formation from the                                          e^-  +  e+ -->e^ “annihilation” process with the electron/positron unit. 

 There is a possibility that some collisions could produce shock waves such as to produce neutrons, or neutron-like units, from the “Null set units” existing in the “vacuum” of the Collider. It is definitely possible, that, over time, there will be detected signals from the formation of simple Hydrogen atoms and Deuterium atoms in the Collider.

In other words, the feeling here is that--while the Collider has zero chance of finding the “Higgs Boson--” as it cranks  up protons to a maximum relative velocity to the field of 0.7...c, with potential “collision” velocity of 1.4 c .there may well be many results come out which will be consistent with the “O/S Model “(Oscillator/Substance Model which considers all existence as “within a substance of undefined extent and basic unit which is organized into, and/or controlled by oscillators.)”

For the cmns field, there is noted above a couple of ideas.  If, as indicated above, there truly is but a tiny “Energy” difference between basic particles and their “anti-particles” such that they may be inter-convertible, or even associate into the “neutral form” such as “positronium.” there be a possible whole new area of speculation/approaches wherein the reactions involved in low-temperature fusion and transmutation may be due to “exotic” forms of matter. These are units which make sense, but have been unsuspected because of factors such as our never having truly defined “charge,”and our belief in the myth of “Matter-Anti-matter” annihilation.  The latter is, of course, due to the fact of electron-anti-electron combination with the loss of an amount of Kinetic Energy of Collision equal to “mc^2.  It has only recently --within the last eight years-- been that mathematics dealing with the “mass” involved in “mc^2 “ indicates that this “rest mass” is a minimal value which, in The case of “annihilation” may be considered as dispersion of Kinetic Energy of Collision.  “Annihilation” turns out to be logically a “Yin-Yang” combination of  rotating-inverting, “charged,”  vortex oscillators to a  “neutral.”  pulsating oscillator, and “Matter-Anti-matter-Instant-Annihilation-on-Contact” to be a myth.  This last work,unfortunately,  is apparently unknown except in some publications of this writer on the Internet.

Hopefully, at least a small amount of this writer’s material on the Internet will escape into the “Outer-world” for examination be the wider community.   A short, twenty page booklet, Eski’s Perceptual Universes--Framework for the Physical Sciences is the first of several books which will be available from me--and, hopefully, from other sources--in the near future.  To celebrate my eightieth birthday, Jan. 3, I am making a general offer of a “comb-bound, Autographed, special edition” of the above book to anyone who wants one.  Of, course, I’m too broke to send them out without some help with the expenses. They cost me approximately five dollars each for printing and binding, and mailing can cost anywhere from about $2 up, depending on where they are sent. (I haven’t checked the cost of mailing to Australia or England.)

As these things do have a faint possibility of becoming valuable collectors items, I am listing here my address. If anyone is interested, they can send me a mailing address, how they want the book autographed, and whatever they think it might be worth to them. (A zero money response,--  I’m sure that I’m not the only “flat-broke” scientist in the world--should include an e-mail address, I can probably figure out a way to send a pdf file.)

Merry Christmas and Happy Nude (whoops, New) Year

Dean L. Sinclair
221 Eighth Ave. S. E. #7
Aberdeen, SD57401-6173-07
deanls...@gmail.com
1-605-290-2154


, oscillator.