Tantalizingly close: the schedule!

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Selena Deckelmann

unread,
May 7, 2009, 10:33:54 AM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
I've typed in the proto-schedule into the Bridge Content Grid google
doc. Huzzah!

Reid, Igal -- let me know if you need it reformatted. Explanation follows:

Format is: Talk ID, Room #, Date, Start Time, End Time

I had to adjust the start times that were in the spreadsheet in the
afternoon to fit our actual schedule :)

I did not add any rooms or time blocks.

Regarding rooms --

Here's my key for the room #s:

1 - Cooking
2 - Cooking
3 - Hacks
4 - Business
5 - Culture
6 - Chemistry
7 - Large Ballroom
8 - Large Ballroom

I can adjust those to actual room names (I believe Peter came up with
some?) if that helps.


Also, the track-to-room mapping is ROUGH :) I tried to keep to it, and
managed to do it most of the time, but we had to shift things around a
bit to make everything work.

-selena

Kelly Guimont

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:01:11 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
Ooh, what ARE the room names? We should have a scheme. Like:

Mario Brothers Characters
Lord of the Rings Locations
Distributions of Linux
Disney Rides
Pixar Movies
Firefox Code Names
Lady Coders
Videogame Consoles
Nerdcore bands

Those are just some random ideas. What do you guys think?

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:23:28 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Kelly Guimont <kell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ooh, what ARE the room names? We should have a scheme. Like:
>
> Mario Brothers Characters
> Lord of the Rings Locations
> Distributions of Linux
> Disney Rides
> Pixar Movies
> Firefox Code Names
> Lady Coders
> Videogame Consoles
> Nerdcore bands
>
> Those are just some random ideas. What do you guys think?

How many rooms are we talking about? There's always the Marx Brothers
-- Groucho, Harpo, Chico, Wino and Weirdo.

Or the Seven Dwarfs -- Happy, Dopey, Sleazy, Grungy, Slimy, Wino and Weirdo,.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Selena Deckelmann <selen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've typed in the proto-schedule into the Bridge Content Grid google
>> doc.  Huzzah!
>>
>> Reid, Igal -- let me know if you need it reformatted.  Explanation follows:
>>
>> Format is: Talk ID, Room #, Date, Start Time, End Time
>>
>> I had to adjust the start times that were in the spreadsheet in the
>> afternoon to fit our actual schedule :)
>>
>> I did not add any rooms or time blocks.
>>
>> Regarding rooms --
>>
>> Here's my key for the room #s:
>>
>> 1 - Cooking
>> 2 - Cooking
>> 3 - Hacks
>> 4 - Business
>> 5 - Culture
>> 6 - Chemistry
>> 7 - Large Ballroom
>> 8 - Large Ballroom
>>
>> I can adjust those to actual room names (I believe Peter came up with
>> some?) if that helps.
>>
>>
>> Also, the track-to-room mapping is ROUGH :)  I tried to keep to it, and
>> managed to do it most of the time, but we had to shift things around a
>> bit to make everything work.
>>
>> -selena
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>



--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://www.linkedin.com/in/edborasky

I've never met a happy clam. In fact, most of them were pretty steamed.

Bill Jackson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:27:35 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
Ed, I see 8 rooms in Selena's list.  Therefore, I think your dwarves plus perhaps "Whitey" would be in order.


Subject: [osbridgepdx-technology:391] Re: Tantalizingly close: the schedule!
Date: 2009-05-07 12:23:28 PM -0700
From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zzn...@gmail.com>
To: osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:40:05 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bill Jackson <bill.j...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Ed, I see 8 rooms in Selena's list.  Therefore, I think your dwarves plus
> perhaps "Whitey" would be in order.

Nah ... Dumpy? Cagey? Whiny? Snarky?

Amy Farrell

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:51:24 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Bill Jackson <bill.j...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Ed, I see 8 rooms in Selena's list. Therefore, I think your dwarves plus
>> perhaps "Whitey" would be in order.
>>
>
> Nah ... Dumpy? Cagey? Whiny? Snarky?
>
Nerdy.

Selena Deckelmann

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:03:41 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
Thank you all for your room name suggestions.

Our logistics volunteer, Peter (who is doing a great deal of unglamorous
quote gathering and spreadsheet generation that we desperately needed),
has already given this a lot of thought and names were already chosen on
a "bridge" theme.

-selena

Sam Goldstein

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:53:31 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
Snow White?

Bram Pitoyo

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:15:08 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
The bridge theme is only befitting, of course!

–Bram

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky

unread,
May 7, 2009, 6:39:53 PM5/7/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Bram Pitoyo <bramp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The bridge theme is only befitting, of course!

Fremont, Steel, Broadway, Burnside, Morrison, Hawthorne, Marquam, Ross
Island, Sellwood, St. Johns ... we need more rooms!!

Igal Koshevoy

unread,
May 9, 2009, 5:44:33 AM5/9/09
to osbridgepdx...@googlegroups.com, Selena Deckelmann
Thanks for putting this data together, the data looked good.

Reid and I are well-underway on putting together the schedule display. I
believe we have most of low-level code done, and we're working on the
UI. We've gone down a time-block schedule (it groups together things
happening at the same time so that the rows are time and columns are
streams of concurrent events), rather than a time-room grid schedule.
This approach complicates coding, but makes much better use of available
space.

Reid is focused on finishing up the UI for the display. I'm working on
reworking events so they have ScheduleItems (e.g., the coffee break)
that aren't actual session elements. After that, we'll rework events to
allow slug names (e.g., 2009bof for BoFs) and a way to aggregate events
(e.g., 2009 and 2009bof and 2009un) so that we can display a master
schedule for all of their scheduled content, despite it being
effectively part of a separate subevent (e.g., 2009un, the unconference,
will begin accepting proposals right before the conference, but its
proposals will not go into the same pool that the actual conference
sessions).

-igal

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages