although this is possible it would be much better to get the image without the grid and know about the square size of the grid. Then one could make a square selection of this size and shift it over the image and make measurements at every position. A little macro would do and the result will be written to a table or text file.
I am having a bit of a sizing challenge with my stars :) I would like the star size to be the same on the card - however, as you can see - 1 star outshines them all in size. I have tried working with JPG and PNGs - and even converted and uploaded as SVGs however the Flashcard grid code - seems to be adjusting the image size to fit.
Hi Simmy, you can try using PNG or JPG files with the same dimension for each of your images (800x800 pixels for example). You'll also want to keep the size of the stars consistent in all of the files. Here's a sample Flaschard I created following the steps I mentioned above. Is this what you're trying to create? Please let me know if you have other questions! Thanks!
Hey everyone, just wondering if something like this is possible. In grid, you can stretch a single column and row across multiple in order to extend the grid item. Is this possible on a CMS page using the multiple image block?
Again, I understand that you can do this on a normal page with a regular grid. I am specifically asking about CMS pages only. Has anyone found a work around with dragging the corners of grid elements using the multi-image function on a CMS item?
In project A I created 2 multi image fields. The top field was to be filled with 4 - 2:1 ratio portrait photos that would sit on top of the lower grid. The bottom field held the rest of the photos used in that collection. I used 16:9 ratio and 4:5 ratio for the photos in each of my collections but if one image was 16:9 every image in that field had to be 16:9 in order to keep a clean and consistent look.
Material Contours is the academic extension of DOMAIN Office, overseen by Prof. Mitesh Dixit and Tamara Marović, and serves as the repository of the work, which they oversaw while at TU Delft in the Netherlands and Syracuse University in New York.
Could someone please help me out? I'd be happy if I could accomplish #1 and #2 at the bare minimum, but I would love to be able to show the full title (via wrapping) and display the image description.
That worked! Thank you so much, @Ziggy! ? That solves #1 - #3. Any idea how to add the image description below the title also? (And format it with a slightly smaller font?) I may choose not to do that if it looks too crowded, however having a little bit of smaller description text below the title may look nice.
Also I just realized that the "Clickthrough URL" is only active on the image itself and not if you click on the title text. Is it possible to add Custom CSS to allow the user to click on the text to open the link also?
Thanks!
If you have many images in a Discourse post, you can now have them automatically arranged into a nice grid. All you need to do is wrap them in [grid] ... [/grid] tags, and the images will be neatly arranged. This is a core feature as of this commit, enabled on all Discourse instances.
This feature is similar to a few theme components (Masonry Image Gallery, Tiles Image Gallery). The main difference is that the arrangement of images in the grid will align at both the top and the bottom of the element. A few additional technical notes:
Is there any plan to make the grids automatic? If this happens I can simple rebake the posts and keeps the grid layout. Until then I think I can hide the grid button and use the theme component safely.
Yes, but not without [grid] tags. Automatically converting images into a grid without tags would violate the CommonMark spec, we very much prefer to avoid that. (In my first internal draft of this feature, I did start with an automatic grid.)
1. You can center them horizontally and vertically so that they remain square and centered inside the image box. That way you can set up all your images to have the same size image block and your images can appear as you intended them.
I've now played around and found spacers the easiest way to create the grid layout I want. But I'm stuck on how to use spacers to vary my image widths (I can create multiple columns but can't revert back to 1 column!)
I have 3 columns in the attached for 3 images. I now want to add 1x spacer running the full width below this, so I can then insert a full width image. I have looked at several tutorials and tried dragging the spacer but still cannot figure out how to do this without changing the layout completely!
IM very new to css grid and i am having difficulties getting my images to fall into the grid for whatever reason. they seem to be representing on top of my grid not within.. any help would be appreciated..
I watched some videos and this was as far as i got, i am still learning how and when to combine classes and stuff. I did some goodgle searching and most people just put blurbs of information together which wasnt helpful at all.
Interface Definition: Expression evaluation error at function a!gridField [line 2]: A grid component [label="Feedback Details"] has an invalid value for "columns". A grid column [label="File"] has encountered an error. Expression evaluation error at function a!imageField [line 44]: The image at index 1 in an image gallery component [label=""] has an invalid value for "document". "document" must not be null.
ADOBE PORTFOLIO. Trying to upload vertical images along with horizontal images to a photo grid for my portfolio. For some reason, the vertical images only appear either sideways or stretched wide to fit in with horizontal photos. Is there a way to fix this so that my vertical images appear as they are?
When images are appearing upside down or rotated, that usually means you took pictures with an iPhone or iPad that was not held correctly with volume buttons pointing down. Apple has built in software to compensate for this rotation, but other machines, email and the web do not. The best solution is to hold your device correctly. Or rotate images afterwards to correct the orientation and save with Metadata set to NONE.
Same here. Photos taken on a pro level dslr. They appear the right way on the camera and the computer, but not the right way on Adobe Portfolio until they were re-saved. It was a small minority of images taken at different times on different pro cameras. Seems like a minor glitch more than anything.
I honestly don't think this is a failure of web-based PhotoGrid module. More than likely your camera is adding Exif metadata to the image file for it's own set of reasons. I'm guessing this would happen with almost any web-based app that strips metadata from images. If you want to file a reproducible bug report, go to Portfolio Support.
I struggled with this problem for half an hour or maybe more. None of these stratigies seemed to work. What did end up working was this:
First, take all of your photos you may have on your desk top or a hard drive and add them to the photos app. (I use apple, it's the app that comes with your device for photos.)
Second, after all of your photos are on the app, select them all (if they are in ramdom places you can add them all to a single album) and on the top left hand of your screen you should see "File" this isn't in the photos app, its on the computer itself. click "File" and then "Export" you should see "Export x Photos" where x is the number of photos you have selected. Click that.
Third, select your settings, (remember websites can only use certain file types) and click export
My settings:
Photo Kind: JPEG
Generally the grid should be below the drawing objects and with lines etc. you can't even see which is above which but I use images that I wish could be properly at the bottom of the whole pile. I would like to be able to see my grid over the image so I can use it while keeping the image on to digitise from.
In the ol' 2004 I have where I am at the moment, the Grid always sits on top of everything, regardless of where things are in the draw order. Not just images of assorted kinds [.bmp, .jpg, .png], but solid Hatches, linework, etc., and whether or not image frames are turned on. If it's not that way in newer versions, that's unfortunate. In 2004, the Grid is only dots -- could the difference be related to its being lines in newer versions? If so, is there a setting to have it be old-style dots instead?
Nico, thanks, it does put the grid lines to the top but unfortunately the image goes dark so that I can't really see it and it goes black when I zoom out. And everything becomes super slow. Is it possible to do this in 2D or without the effects? I am only working in 2D anyway.
Hello
you can use this trick to get the number of pixels of the image. I put the 100 in order to have a low mesh and not a 16 millions vertexes mesh if you want to open a big image.
image.png1094728 155 KB
So with image sampler you keep using 0 to 1 width and height but has you know the number of pixel il will be easy for you to convert that in pixel size.
I think your nearly there on a solution honestly! My first question is will you be recommending the same number of books each time? I see 8 books recommended, 2 rows of 4, If that number is the same always, then I think we can work out a relatively simple solution using columns.
No, not, in this case, I feel like you might run into overwriting errors and issues in your directory. I think the best way is to try my idea of making a list of just the images you want to show, and putting them in a shape that can be easily incorporated into the loop.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us understand how visitors move around the site and which pages are most frequently visited.
7fc3f7cf58