The reason I think it will be a grand idea to open another mail box for what I
have christened the "Left Bank Original Fiction Roundtable (LBOFRT)--that sounds
like an acronym the Rainbow Nation might favor, oh, D. Larson, where are
you?--definitely unwieldy and a working title only til we come up with something
better--what was your suggestion, the Green Garter Room?) is the sheer amount of
mail this little enterprise generates. I get every message in duplicate,
triplicate or quadru
As I was saying before being so prematurely cut off is I tried earlier to set up
a Gmail account, but after 20 minutes of failing to come up with a suitable
username that wasn't taken, I decided to shelve it, come home, have a drink and
try again in the morning. My MO for coping with frustrating situations: Fuck
it, I'll worry about it tomorrow--where's the beer? Call me Scarlett O'Hara
2010.
Actually in the first half of your story you did a fine job of painting the
ladylike nature of Ms. J. So well that I wondered if this was possibly ever
going to get down and dirty or just coast along with Austenian propriety (Austen
as a hep cat, mind you--I detected some cool. Must have been great fun to be a
college student when you were in college. I was a college student at a
Presbyterian school in Amish country during the Reagan era. Just imagine how
much fun that was! (dry campus dry county . . .had to go at least 30 miles to
find a godforsaken drink--not that I did that until I was 21). I really was
square, and repressed, the product of a German-Lutheran upbringing--just ask our
friend Larson. Now, I did not swing quite as far into debauchery as
she--repressed as I was, I always knew what kind of urges I was repressing . .
but as soon as I got out on my own recognizance, I made sure to collect a few of
the experiences I'd been missing out on. It took several years to do it, but,
like your wife, I finally found a candidate to relieve me of the burden of my
inexperience and so set about arranging his seduction, and let him think it was
the other way 'round. It was all a bit pragmatic, actually, but to move forward
as an adult in life, I felt it had to be done. I waited (and waited) for the
proper scenario of courtship and ring and dress and cake, but it never
materialized. Still hasn't. If I had maintained my scruples, I would be that
saddest of creatures, the 40-something virgin spinster with cats. Only trumped
for pathos by the 50-something virginal spinster with cats. You would be
surprised, or perhaps not, by the number of those I run into in my profession,
of both genders. Library folk fall into three categories, it seems: the
married, the gay (both genders) and the asexual. Really, there are so many
celibate librarians across all age groups that live alone (often with cats,
their parents, or both), who never dated, never had sex, don't show the
slightest interest in either gender and seem perfectly content. They go home to
their knitting, their tea, thier microwave dinners, their public television, and
their piles of cosy mysteries, sci fi, romance pulp or whatever their personal
literary crack is.
And then there's me. I fit the demographic in all respects but one: I am NOT a
contented celibate and sometimes I believe I will explode. But I have to sit
there in library conferences with my spectacularly dowdy colleagues and pretend
that all this yammering about the latest in children's picture books is all that
there is to life. NOT. Librarians wear a lot of applique sweaters with holiday
whimsy on them and studiously avagoid hair products and carry bookbags. I
refuse to do any of the above. Clearly I am a mole. The librarian is just my
cover . . .by night I am a cyber geisha with a much less dull life. This is my
Second Life and in it I feel more alive than in First Blah Life.
But back to your story . . .so I take it that the deflowering was not actually
consummated in the '62 Chevy, but that the pot was stirred to a nice rolling
boil. Weren't you lucky, to be the first to dip your spoon in and stir that
pot? Or whatever the equivilent is with egg salad. Hope the denouement was a
happy realization of anticipation for you both. Mine was a bit of a letdown,
but not unexpectedly so. It wasn't with someone who I loved who was going to be
around for the long-term . .I know that going in. Or rather, before his going
in. But he was somebody I cared about who I knew would be gentle and
appreciative and it did get better. Paving the way for the real thing, in emy
mind. I have a friend who's quite a bit younger than me, one of those celibate
librarians I mentioned, but she is still young enough for this not to be her
permanent state. However, rather than trying to meet a man in real life, she
buries herself during every free moment in piles and piles of romance fiction.
She reads it all, from the prim and Victorian to the vampire erotica and
everything in between. Says her preferred type is 'cowboy'. I have cautioned
her a little to not expect real life, particularly the first time, to be like it
is in the pages of those books. But youth has to figure things out for itself.
I have a feeling that she is going to be in more or less my shoes in 15 years if
she stays on her current path. C'est la vie.
Did I hear you say your wife is proofreading as you go? She's a sport. ;-) I
Does she get to see all our correspondence? If so, my message to her is: Good
on you! Well done. A lady in the lunchroom and a vixen in the '62 Chevy. You
men, see . . .it's not that hard to figure out what will push your buttons.
Besides, being a vixen in the lunchroom might get us in trouble with the
authorities. Too much highspiritedness in public in a woman gets us labelled
loose, crazy or dangerous. It's much more rewarding to be an exhibitionist in
private. One is much more in tune with her audience that way.
I'm sure that her determination was not the only thing that was steely that day,
either. Quite a memory. The degree to which paper memory adheres to real-time
memory is the author's little secret. It's not really fiction if it happened as
you say . . .then we are verging into memoir. But memoir is to me a preferable
form because it means that somebody actually did those things. I have been an
apiring writer since I learned how to write, but I guess I am a writer in search
of a genre. I used to think that fiction was my natural fit, but the older I
get, the less I want to make things up and the more I seek to make my own life
worth writing about instead. Ironically, the two pursuits I love more than
anything (well, OK, the two pursuits in my top 3 that I love the most)--reading
and writing are two things which require solitude and a bit of a remove from
human interactions to do well, or at least to apply the discipline required.
I've had enough of such loneliness, isolation and escapism and really want to
jump in and tear the meat off the bones of life, and pursue my #1 passion.
Which can be done in solitude and isolation but is much more satisfying with
someone else in the room. I think if I had that, I could never read another
word or write another sentence and still be more content than I am now. All
this deluge of wordiage that I leave in my wake everywhere I visit . . this is
sublimation. I am frustrated, therefore, I write. A lot. And writing does
really mean writing and is not code for anything else. ;-)
Perhaps my fate is to be that most loathed and courted of creatures--the
critic. You see how I procrastinate on actually sending you an original work.
In time, in time. The ideas have to marinate until they are properly seasoned
and ready.
Here's wishing you happy tequila dreams--
MM
----- Original Message ----
From: JP David McDonald <jpd...@gmail.com>
To: Original Fiction <original...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sat, August 28, 2010 5:49:19 PM
Subject: Re: Egg Salad Sensualities (Part 2 of Two: Revised)
NOTE: Upon further review, I found that I had omitted answers to some
of Ms. Hikari's queries. Hence the former copy of this reply has beenak
**********************
NOTE: Upon further review, I found that I had omitted answers to some
of Ms. Hikari's queries. Hence the former copy of this reply has beenak
deleted and replaced with this, including the needful amendments. Once
again, my replies as set apart from the original text by double hymens
-- or that is, like this: (--) and this.
***********************
Hahaha! Well, 'tis OK. I know why this happened--because you had deflowering on the brain, that's why. Just another of my questions for God when I get upstairs--like an apprendix . .there to no apparent purpose except to cause pain and aggravation. Did you spot what I'm talking about?
--- On Sun, 8/29/10, JP David McDonald <jpd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: JP David McDonald <jpd...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Egg Salad Sensualities (Part 2 of Two: Revised)
Bon Soir, ma chérie
--
J.
YOU are a muse, dear girl. That is what you are. You tell me that you
have read through this story AGAIN? Well, on strength of that, so have
I, and I see that as you have inspired it to flow forth from my
memory, it's the only thing I've written in years that amounts to a
damn. I'm going to send it to the New Yorker, because they asked me to
do that, after the last poem I sent them which in their view they
could not accept. They said, "Send us something else." Can you
imagine? They wanted to see "something else." Well, thanks to you ma
chéri that is exactly what they are going to get. Something else.
L'amour sans la fin, votre ami . . .
Jean
Sorry for the delay . . .
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Hikari <hika...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Those Frenchies really know how to sign off on a letter, don't they?
>
> Too bad she didn't make you tuna
> salad sandwiches that day, or else you could have called it "A Perfect
> Day for Tuna Fish".
LOL!
> I know how you like your Salinger. I just have a
> feeling that they are going to want to see another title. You have a
> great nostalgia piece there, but somehow you've got to upscale the
> pitch for so that Manhattan snobs that would never deign to eat egg
> salad will still want to read it. By the time the egg salad is
> actually introduced, you've already hooked 'em in.
Well, I'll certainly take these thoughts into serious consideration.
If the Muse has a better idea, she'll lay it on me just like she
always does. She's a real honey when it comes to that, ol' Gladys in
the Sky with Glasses.
Tomorrow night, I'll be getting started on the expansion of that
description, which it may be, will include some of the material you
asked about on the forum.
Tonight we watched one hell of an interview with Christopher Hitchens
conducted at the New York Public Library. In case you'd be interested
. . .
http://fora.tv/2010/06/04/Christopher_Hitchens_Some_Confessions_and_Contradictions
The introductory comments by the host are a bit of a bore, but soon as
Hitchens is on the dais it starts to rock.
This was conducted just previous to the bad news he was to get
concerning that malignant tumor in his throat. For that reason, it's
just downright eery, how full of portent of what was coming, the
conversation turned out to be.
By the looks of him in his most recent interview, if he lasts another
month it will be a miracle. Sad. Such a brilliant mind, so tragically
blind to the help he cannot see to receive.
--
Buona Sera, Signorina
Got your speakers hooked up yet?
Muse is still working her way through the first cup of coffee for the day and is
not feeling very inspired at the moment. I'm thinking something as simple as
"Lunch Hour". "Lunch Hour at the Biscayne"? It'd be cool if you could work in
that righteous automobile (I mean, the chariot of sin) in somehow. You know how
pretentious New Yorker readers are--they do like their metaphors. Playing
around with the idea of lunch hour is good 'cause the story does start out in a
normal lunchtime scenario before going sideways into the carnal direction. Pull
a fast one on 'em, like. They start thinking they are reading a usual campus
tale and then the story becomes something else. If you tip them off ahead of
time that this story is going in the 'sensual' direction, you lose the element
of surprise. And that, my friend, is your ace in the hole.
(Non-accidental punnage.)
Chris Hitchens . . .you're right, what a sad waste. Well, he, Douglas Adams
and Bill Maher can keep each other company in hell. Bet they won't feel quite
so astute and so far and above all us moronic Bible beaters then, will they?
Some say the world will end in fire; others in ice . . . To me, hell must be a
cold place. I've never really bought the neverending always burning fire
argument. Jesus does mention it, so that's a bit problematic. He is
referencing the Old Testament conception of Gahenna. I don't know. Perhaps the
experience of hell is individual, unlike its opposite, where the souls are all
united in perfect joy and community. The punishment of hell is to suffer
whatever it is you suffer completely alone. There are other souls in hell, but
they are each in their own separate misery . . .there is no communion in hell,
even communion in suffering. I have always envisioned hell as a frozen, dark
wasteland where one is completely alone for eternity except with one's regrets
and self-recriminations. If God is Light, and hell is the absence of God, then
it must follow that hell has neither light nor warmth of any kind. Guess Bill
M. will be finding out for himself eventually just how 'Religulous' that all is.
Off for more coffee. Look forward to seeing the expansions. Not TOO expanded .
. .this is, after all, the New Yorker. ;-)
MM
----- Original Message ----
From: John McDonald <jpd...@gmail.com>
To: original...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 2:50:20 AM
Subject: Re: Egg Salad Sensualities (Part 2 of Two: Revised)