Support? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comment |
HB
2850 A Provides
that insurer may not issue individual long term care
insurance policy until insurer receives written
designation of full name and residential address of at
least one person to whom insurer can send notice of
lapse or termination because of failure to pay premium,
or receives written waiver of right to designate person
to receive notice.
|
Senate Business |
Already testified in support in House. |
|
HB
3041 Directs
school districts to allow students to use sun-protective
clothing and sunscreen.
|
Senate Health Care |
||
SB
631 Establishes
Health Care for All Oregon Board to develop, implement
and have oversight of Health Care for All Oregon Plan to
be administered by Oregon Health Authority.
|
Senate Health Care |
||
HB
2336 A Allows
filing and service of notice of appeal by mailing or
dispatch for delivery within three calendar days via
United States Postal Service or commercial delivery
service.
|
Senate Judiciary |
Already testified in support in House. | |
SB 294 Grants Oregon Government Ethics Commission administrative rulemaking authority to assist in commission's enforcement of executive session provisions of public meeting laws. | Senate Rules |
Trivial, but OK. |
|
HB
2600 Requires
continuation of group health insurance coverage for
employee on family leave on same terms as when employee
is not on leave.
|
Senate Workforce |
Already testified in support in House. |
Oppose? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comments |
HB
2892 A Requires
that National League of Families' POW/MIA flag be
displayed with Oregon State flag on public buildings in
this state.
|
Senate Veterans |
This bill requires every public building with
flagpoles display the POW/MIA flag every day of the year.
Give it a rest.
Vietnam has spent millions of dollars recovering remains of
U.S.
soldiers. The U.S. spends over $20 million a year on trying
to recover
bones and teeth. How about displaying the Peace Symbol Flag
instead? This bill passed the House by a vote of 57-0. No
guts. |
From: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Dan Meek
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:54 AM
To: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Progressive Party - Legislation 35] Oregon Progressive Party Bills to Support or Oppose (more)
Here are bills coming up for hearings in next 2 weeks or so.
Please reply to this email. In the reply, indicate in the left column your agreement (Y) or disagreement (N) with my recommendation for
each bill.
Please reply by today 8:00 pm. Testimony on some bills must be submitted by midnight tonight.
This list is very short. There are only 4 new bills on it.
If you have comments, please add them below mine in the last column.
If you can think of a better way for OPP to take positions on bills, please let me know.
Bills May
Support? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comment |
y |
HB 2850 A Provides that insurer may not issue individual long term care insurance policy until insurer receives written designation of full name and residential address of at least one person to whom insurer can send notice of lapse or termination because of failure to pay premium, or receives written waiver of right to designate person to receive notice. |
Senate Business |
Already testified in support in House. |
n |
HB 3041 Directs school districts to allow students to use sun-protective clothing and sunscreen. |
Senate Health Care |
y |
SB 631 Establishes Health Care for All Oregon Board to develop, implement and have oversight of Health Care for All Oregon Plan to be administered by Oregon Health Authority. |
Senate Health Care |
y |
HB 2336 A Allows filing and service of notice of appeal by mailing or dispatch for delivery within three calendar days via United States Postal Service or commercial delivery service. |
Senate Judiciary |
Already testified in support in House. |
y |
SB 294 Grants Oregon Government Ethics Commission administrative rulemaking authority to assist in commission's enforcement of executive session provisions of public meeting laws. |
Senate Rules |
Trivial, but OK. |
y |
HB 2600 Requires continuation of group health insurance coverage for employee on family leave on same terms as when employee is not on leave. |
Senate Workforce |
Already testified in support in House. |
Oppose? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comments |
n |
HB 2892 A Requires that National League of Families' POW/MIA flag be displayed with Oregon State flag on public buildings in this state. |
Senate Veterans |
This bill requires every public building with flagpoles display the POW/MIA flag every day of the year. Give it a rest. Vietnam has spent millions of dollars recovering remains of U.S. soldiers. The U.S. spends over $20 million a year on trying to recover bones and teeth. How about displaying the Peace Symbol Flag instead? This bill passed the House by a vote of 57-0. No guts. |
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Oregon Progressive Party - Legislation Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
oregon-progressive-party-legi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/oregon-progressive-party-legislation-committee.
Support? | Bill | Committee | Dan's Comment |
Y |
HB 2850 A Provides that insurer may not issue individual long term care insurance policy until insurer receives written designation of full name and residential address of at least one person to whom insurer can send notice of lapse or termination because of failure to pay premium, or receives written waiver of right to designate person to receive notice. | Senate Business | Already testified in support in House. |
Y |
HB 3041 Directs school districts to allow students to use sun-protective clothing and sunscreen. |
DD comment: so this allows but does not require school districts to do so. | Senate Health Care | |
Y |
SB 631 Establishes Health Care for All Oregon Board to develop, implement and have oversight of Health Care for All Oregon Plan to be administered by Oregon Health Authority. |
DD comment: This is HCAO bill and needs our support. | Senate Health Care | |
Y |
HB 2336 A Allows filing and service of notice of appeal by mailing or dispatch for delivery within three calendar days via United States Postal Service or commercial delivery service. | Senate Judiciary | Already testified in support in House. |
Y |
SB 294 Grants Oregon Government Ethics Commission administrative rulemaking authority to assist in commission's enforcement of executive session provisions of public meeting laws. | Senate Rules | Trivial, but OK. |
Y |
HB 2600 Requires continuation of group health insurance coverage for employee on family leave on same terms as when employee is not on leave. | Senate Workforce | Already testified in support in House. |
Oppose? | Bill | Committee | Dan's Comments |
Y |
HB 2892 A Requires that National League of Families' POW/MIA flag be displayed with Oregon State flag on public buildings in this state. | Senate Veterans | This bill requires every public building with flagpoles display the POW/MIA flag every day of the year. Give it a rest. Vietnam has spent millions of dollars recovering remains of U.S. soldiers. The U.S. spends over $20 million a year on trying to recover bones and teeth. How about displaying the Peace Symbol Flag instead? This bill passed the House by a vote of 57-0. No guts. |
Support? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comment |
HB
2020 Alters
definition of "public official." Prohibits Governor, First Partner, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Attorney General and Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries from receiving money or other consideration for speaking engagement or presentation. |
House Rules |
Fairly trivial bill to define "First Partner"
and
ban speaking honoraria for statewide elected officials and
the First
Partner. Very minor tinkering with ethics laws. I suggest
we support
but note its trivial nature and failure to address
significant ethics
problems, like unlimited use of campaign contributions to
pay
relatives, including any First Partner. |
|
Oppose? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comments |
SB
292 Repeals
duplicative provision regarding conflict of interest for
planning commission members.
|
House Rules |
Very misleading title. Actually blows a
big loophole in existing ethics statutes applicable to city
and county
planning commissions. Existing law requires commissioners
to recuse
themselves from any decision involving the financial
interests of the
member of spouse, brother, sister, etc. This bill would
delete the
recusal requirement and merely require the member to
disclose the
conflict of interest. |
Support? | Bill | Committee | Dan's Comment |
Y |
HB 2020 Alters definition of "public official." Prohibits Governor, First Partner, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Attorney General and Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries from receiving money or other consideration for speaking engagement or presentation. | House Rules | Fairly trivial bill to define "First Partner" and ban speaking honoraria for statewide elected officials and the First Partner. Very minor tinkering with ethics laws. I suggest we support but note its trivial nature and failure to address significant ethics problems, like unlimited use of campaign contributions to pay relatives, including any First Partner. |
Oppose? | Bill | Committee | Dan's Comments |
SB 292 Repeals duplicative provision regarding conflict of interest for planning commission members. | House Rules | Very misleading title. Actually blows a big loophole in existing ethics statutes applicable to city and county planning commissions. Existing law requires commissioners to recuse themselves from any decision involving the financial interests of the member of spouse, brother, sister, etc. This bill would delete the recusal requirement and merely require the member to disclose the conflict of interest. |
From: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com [mailto:oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Meek
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 3:57 AM
To: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Progressive Party - Legislation 38] Oregon Progressive Party Bills to Support or Oppose (more)
Here are bills coming up for hearings in next week or so.
Please reply to this email. In the reply, indicate in the left column your agreement (Y) or disagreement (N) with my recommendation for
each bill.
Please reply by May 3.
If you have comments, please add them below mine in the last column.
If you can think of a better way for OPP to take positions on bills, please let me know.
Bills May (second edition)
Support? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comment |
Y |
HB 2020
Alters definition of "public official."
|
House Rules |
Fairly trivial bill to define "First Partner" and ban speaking honoraria for statewide elected officials and the First Partner. Very minor tinkering with ethics laws. I suggest we support but note its trivial nature and failure to address significant ethics problems, like unlimited use of campaign contributions to pay relatives, including any First Partner. |
Oppose? |
Bill |
Committee |
Dan's Comments |
SB 292 Repeals duplicative provision regarding conflict of interest for planning commission members. |
House Rules |
Very misleading title. Actually blows a big loophole in existing ethics statutes applicable to city and county planning commissions. Existing law requires commissioners to recuse themselves from any decision involving the financial interests of the member of spouse, brother, sister, etc. This bill would delete the recusal requirement and merely require the member to disclose the conflict of interest. |
--
From: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com [mailto:oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan Meek
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 3:57 AM
To: oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Progressive Party - Legislation 38] Oregon Progressive Party Bills to Support or Oppose (more)
Here are bills coming up for hearings in next week or so.
Please reply to this email. In the reply, indicate in the left column your agreement (Y) or disagreement (N) with my recommendation for each bill.
Please reply by May 3.
If you have comments, please add them below mine in the last column.
If you can think of a better way for OPP to take positions on bills, please let me know.
Bills May (second edition)
Support?
Bill
Committee
Dan's Comment
Yes
HB 2020 Alters definition of "public official."
Prohibits Governor, First Partner, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, Attorney General and Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries from receiving money or other consideration for speaking engagement or presentation.House Rules
Fairly trivial bill to define "First Partner" and ban speaking honoraria for statewide elected officials and the First Partner. Very minor tinkering with ethics laws. I suggest we support but note its trivial nature and failure to address significant ethics problems, like unlimited use of campaign contributions to pay relatives, including any First Partner.
Oppose?
Bill
Committee
Dan's Comments
Oppose
SB 292 Repeals duplicative provision regarding conflict of interest for planning commission members.
House Rules
Very misleading title. Actually blows a big loophole in existing ethics statutes applicable to city and county planning commissions. Existing law requires commissioners to recuse themselves from any decision involving the financial interests of the member of spouse, brother, sister, etc. This bill would delete the recusal requirement and merely require the member to disclose the conflict of interest.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Oregon Progressive Party - Legislation Committee" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to oregon-progressive-party-legi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to oregon-progressive-part...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oregon-progressive-party-legislation-committee.
Dan Meek |
503-293-9021 | d...@meek.net | 866-926-9646 fax |
Dan Meek |
503-293-9021 | d...@meek.net | 855-280-0488 fax |
SECTION 2. ORS 837.365 is amended to read: 837.365. [A public body may not operate an unmanned aircraft system that is capable of firing a bullet or other projectile, directing a laser or otherwise being used as a weapon.] A person commits a Class A misdemeanor if the person operates an unmanned aircraft system that is capable of firing a bullet or projectile or otherwise operates an unmanned aircraft system in a manner that causes the system to function as a dangerous weapon as defined in ORS 161.015.