[15:14:33] src/constraint_solver/routing.cc:923: Check failed: (vehicles) == (starts.size())
I had thought what I was expressing was that there were two depots, nodes 0 and 1. And that if a route started from 0 then it had to end at 0 (and the same for node 1). I thought the search would choose which depot the vehicle would start from. It appears though that the number of depots has to be the same as the number of vehicles. Is it valid to express that there are several potential depots and the vehicle can choose at most one of them? I.e. basically a disjunction over the depot choice.--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "or-tools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to or-tools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Hallo,
If you define depots (starts and ends), you have to define vehicles, which start from these depots. The number of vehicles should be equal to the number of starts and the number of ends. A vehicle can start from one depot and can end at another one.
Thomas Masuth
phone +49 421 741 48
Diese Nachricht (inklusive aller Anhänge) ist vertraulich. Sie darf ausschließlich durch den vorgesehenen Empfänger und Adressaten gelesen, kopiert oder genutzt werden. Sollten Sie diese Nachricht versehentlich erhalten haben, bitten wir, den Absender (durch Antwort-E-Mail) hiervon unverzüglich zu informieren und die Nachricht zu löschen. Jede unerlaubte Nutzung oder Weitergabe des Inhalts dieser Nachricht, sei es vollständig oder teilweise, ist unzulässig.
This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error please contact the sender (by return E-Mail) immediately and delete this message. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
--