Pax Web 8 - 2 more tasks before GA

[Grzegorz Grzybek]

Hello

I'd like to present the state of Pax Web 8. I hope to release Pax Web 8.0.0.GA in mid-September.

I maintain a todo.txt[1] file where I present the issues I'd like to implement in given milestones.

The priority is to have R7 compliance, though without running the TCK[2], because I didn't have time to find out an easy way to actually run the TCK :) However I'm glad it's public now.

So summarizing, these R7 features were implemented recently:

 - Whiteboard preprocessors
 - RegEx filter mapping
 - Listener ordering according to ranking
 - Session per OsgiContextModel / OsgiServletContext (including proper javax.servlet.context.tempdir handling)
 - org.osgi.framework.ServiceObjects and proper service management (unget, prototype, singleton, bundle scopes)

Also I've implemented (or ensured the stability and consistency between Jetty, Tomcat and Undertow) for these:

 - Whiteboard WebSockets - they work both through WABs, Whiteboard and even WebContainer (HttpService)
 - Karaf integration tests - all tests work for all three runtimes. In Pax Web 7 the tests were running mostly on Jetty

The remaining *two* tasks are:

 - Mixing (in different order) WAB and Whiteboard contexts, so we can install a WAB and Whiteboard/HttpService alter it by registering for example Preprocessors
 - Whiteboard DTOs

kind regards

Grzegorz Grzybek

===

[1]: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/main/todo.txt

[2]: https://github.com/osgi/osgi/

[Achim Nierbeck]

Hey Gzegorz,

great work you did on Pax Web.

Will be very interested in seeing the final product after you finished :)

best regards, Achim

--
--
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhoca2-B%2BcqCCg26O2KFaDUUBOo7tNx_%2B_Htt2i9riQYEg%40mail.gmail.com.

--

Apache Member

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

[Serge Huber]

Just a quick question will the javax.validation be updated ? Currently I believe it’s still using spec 1.1, but it would be nice if we could upgrade to 2.0

Regards,

  Serge… 

[Grzegorz Grzybek]

Hi

wt., 31 sie 2021 o 17:38 'Serge Huber' via OPS4J <op...@googlegroups.com> napisał(a):

Just a quick question will the javax.validation be updated ? Currently I believe it’s still using spec 1.1, but it would be nice if we could upgrade to 2.0

Hmm, Pax Web itself doesn't require any Validation API bundle. If you see validation API (now both 1.1 and 2.0) in effective pom of Pax Web, these come from the samples used (Spring, Vaadin, Primefaces).

regards

Grzegorz Grzybek

 

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/9ABCE2F3-89FD-4232-BBE5-9A030E27E17E%40jahia.com.