Update on ci.ops4j.org well-being

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Toni Menzel

unread,
May 25, 2018, 6:57:41 AM5/25/18
to 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J Infrastructure
Hey,

to discuss this in a smaller group: at the moment ci.ops4j.org is not reachable anymore, a hard reboot (before also a soft reboot) did not have any visible effect.
Biggest issue, after years of absence, i cannot access this box using my ssh pk currently. 
Steps taken now:
- contacted provider to have a look at the terminal & hardware (just in case)
- contact Harald since he had root access in the past and actively worked with this box in 2016.

For the future I'd like to get rid of working with hardware like a cave-man. What is it, 2018?
Anyway, lets see. This is just an update for you to see what is going on.

Thanks,
Toni

Achim Nierbeck

unread,
May 25, 2018, 9:26:51 AM5/25/18
to 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J Infrastructure
Hi Toni,

I'm with you, though circleCI tests are regularly failing for pax-web because of non test issues.
I'm fine with any other kind of solution besides running our own build infrastructure ;)

regards, Achim


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J Infrastructure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j-infra+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master 

Harald Wellmann

unread,
May 29, 2018, 5:06:43 AM5/29/18
to ops4j...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,

I agree that we don't absolutely need or own server for CI, there's Travis CI and other services available free of charge for open source projects.

But we also have a SonarQube instance running on ci.ops4j.org. AFAIK, SonarSource also has a public offering for open source projects (and in fact they are monitoring some ancient versions like Pax Exam 1.x or so), but I'm not sure if these are freely configurable, and without project-specific configuration, static analysis doesn't make too much sense.

Cheers,
Harald
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages