How should operator package upgrade Channels look like in v1?

[Anik Bhattacharjee]

Hey OLM Devs, 

There's been a few ad hoc conversations about what operator package upgrade channels should look like for OLM v1, and there's rising consensus about having to rethink/redesign what channels mean for v1. 

We want to start formalizing some of those discussions, but we'd like to first get everybody who cares about upgrade channels on a call and get on the same page about what we're thinking + read the room for what avenues will be appropriate for exploring further.  

Please join us for a brainstorming session this week on Wednesday 9:00 am EST in the following location 

Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/5511723751

Meeting Password: 77777

Meeting Time: Wednesday(March 29th) 9:00-10:00am EST

Anik Bhattacharjee

Software Engineer - Openshift

Red Hat

300 A Street

Boston, MA 02210

[Piotr Godowski]

Thank you - is there any pre-read before the meeting to digest and come prepared?

Thanks,

Piotr.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "operator-framework-olm-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to operator-framework-...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/operator-framework-olm-dev/CACkvfxTEoSX%2BB%3DWQbwJdy1pR_%3DSWaz7cN1cr3fNR5GdEn9h81A%40mail.gmail.com.

--

Piotr Godowski
<piotr.g...@gmail.com>

[Anik Bhattacharjee]

Piotr, 

That's a good question. Apologies for not adding more details earlier, but so far all we have in the concrete form is this chat: 

https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C0181L6JYQ2/p1678717821930539?thread_ts=1678476408.854869&cid=C0181L6JYQ2

The goal of the meeting is to assess if this is the right time to create more concrete materials (readable proposals/prototypes etc) in this direction. 

Hope this is helpful. 

Anik Bhattacharjee

Software Engineer - Openshift

Red Hat

300 A Street

Boston, MA 02210