http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
--
Используется революционный почтовый клиент браузера Opera:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
> feel the difference :-(
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
Quite a difference, yes. I don't know anything about SVG debugging, maybe
you could file a bug report?
--
Rijk van Geijtenbeek
Opera Software ASA
Tweak: http://my.opera.com/Rijk/blog/
"The most common way to get usability wrong is to listen to what users
say rather than actually watching what they do." - J.Nielsen
> feel the difference :-(
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
>
>
Check the error console. What I get:
CSS - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
HTML style attribute
Invalid value for property: fill
Line 1:
opacity: 0.63964; fill: url(#radialGradient4680) rgb(0, 0, 0);
fill-opacity: 1;
--------------------------------------------------------------^
And a whole lot more of similar ones. Removing all the rgb(0, 0, 0) from
all the instances mentioned in the error console got me this image:
http://download.remcol.ath.cx/Akonadi-Logo.svg
And it works fine :)
Since reading specs is not my strong point, let me just point to the
relevant one so someone else might be able to tell if this is a bug or if
this is exactly as the spec states (and therefore a bug in inkscape):
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html#SpecifyingPaint
--
Remco Lanting
[Unofficial Opera bug tracker links]
http://opera.remcol.ath.cx/bugs |
http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=217364 |
remco.lanting...@gmail.com
indeed
> Since reading specs is not my strong point, let me just point to the
> relevant one so someone else might be able to tell if this is a bug or
> if this is exactly as the spec states (and therefore a bug in inkscape):
> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/painting.html#SpecifyingPaint
This spec links to CSS spec
later implies something like "color: rgb (x,y,z)"
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/types.html#DataTypeColor
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/syndata.html#value-def-color
So, i guess if rdb is not to be direct value of 'fill' property, but the
value of color sub-property of fill property?
so i changed lines to something like "...fill: url(#radialGradient3814);
fill-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); ...."
It also work, yet i can't say if it effectively made Opera recognise the
rgb(0,0,0) or effectively ignore it as unrecgnisable tag :-)
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
> http://download.remcol.ath.cx/Akonadi-Logo.svg
>
XML validator sees no difference though.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.remcol.ath.cx%2FAkonadi-Logo.svg&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fa%2Fa1%2FAkonadi-Logo.svg&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0
even overriding DocType to SVG 1.0 shows lot of errors but not about rgb
> feel the difference :-(
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
Still so in 10.10 final
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:44 +0100, Arioch <the_A...@nm.falsedomain.ru>
wrote:
>> feel the difference :-(
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
> Still so in 10.10 final
The same situation in Opera 10.20 Internal. Build 4744 for SunOS. Qt
library 3.3.8b.
With best regards,
--
Üdvözlettel, http://opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/
Cemasko Viktor. http://www.opera.com/browser/
> Greetings Arioch,
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:44 +0100, Arioch <the_A...@nm.falsedomain.ru>
> wrote:
>
>>> feel the difference :-(
>
>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
>
>> Still so in 10.10 final
>
> The same situation in Opera 10.20 Internal. Build 4744 for SunOS. Qt
> library 3.3.8b.
Don't expect SVG rendering issues to be fixed soon.
These exist since 9.6:
http://dev.webonomic.nl/demo/svg/tutorial/svg-gradient-background-in-opera
Jan
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:07:09 +0100, Viktor Cemasko
> <cem...@fibermail.hu> wrote:
>
>> Greetings Arioch,
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:44 +0100, Arioch
>> <the_A...@nm.falsedomain.ru>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> feel the difference :-(
>>
>>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg
>>>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Akonadi-Logo.svg/128px-Akonadi-Logo.svg.png
>>
>>> Still so in 10.10 final
>>
>> The same situation in Opera 10.20 Internal. Build 4744 for SunOS. Qt
>> library 3.3.8b.
>
> Don't expect SVG rendering issues to be fixed soon.
>
> These exist since 9.6:
>
> http://dev.webonomic.nl/demo/svg/tutorial/svg-gradient-background-in-opera
This one is fixed in 10.5. Alas, Arioch's example isn't.
--
Rijk
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
>> Don't expect SVG rendering issues to be fixed soon.
>>
>> These exist since 9.6:
>>
>> http://dev.webonomic.nl/demo/svg/tutorial/svg-gradient-background-in-opera
>
> This one is fixed in 10.5. Alas, Arioch's example isn't.
>
Is it?
I don't see any gradients in the border examples.
Version
10.50 Internal
Build
6177
Platform
Linux
System
i686, 2.6.31-17-generic