ruote-hhtp and. ruote-kit

[Gonzalo Suarez]

Hi all,

What are the differences between ruote-http and ruote-kit?
We would like to find the best way to move from ruote-rest (ruote
0.9.x) to ruote 2.0 engine + rest wrapping.

Thanks for your help.
Best regards.

Gonzalo.

[John Mettraux]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Gonzalo Suarez
<gonzalo....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What are the differences between ruote-http and ruote-kit?
> We would like to find the best way to move from ruote-rest (ruote
> 0.9.x) to ruote 2.0 engine + rest wrapping.

Hello,

ruote-kit is the one to watch for now. Kenneth is the leader for that
project, ruote-http is much less ambitious, it's mostly an exercise
for me, centered around how the HTTP interface should be. We intend to
have the same interface, but ruote-kit will be the serious one, while
ruote-http is only serious about the interface (it shares with
ruote-kit).

Best regards,

--
John Mettraux - http://jmettraux.wordpress.com

[Kenneth Kalmer]

2009/11/3 John Mettraux <jmet...@openwfe.org>

Hi Gonzalo

John is spot on here. I'm using ruote-http as the interface for the JSON side of ruote-kit, and building the UI on my own accord. John also needed to experiment ahead of time to ensure the engine exposes some conveniences for use in ruote-{http|kit}.

I'll be pushing hard on the code in the coming weeks cause I need it for our production environment as well as a client's.

Best

--
Kenneth Kalmer
kenneth...@gmail.com
http://opensourcery.co.za
@kennethkalmer

[Matteo]

Nice!

If ruote 2.0 is ready for a production environment, it would be nice
to have soon official releases of it and its correlated tools.

Many thanks for your hard work

Regards
Matteo

On Nov 3, 1:41 pm, Kenneth Kalmer <kenneth.kal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/11/3 John Mettraux <jmettr...@openwfe.org>

> kenneth.kal...@gmail.comhttp://opensourcery.co.za
> @kennethkalmer

[Gonzalo Suarez]

Thank you for all the info John and Kenneth.
We'll check ruote-kit for our integration with ruote 2.0.

Best regards.
Gonzalo.