Pitching moment calculation (PM vs VLM)

73 views
Skip to first unread message

Gennaro Barbato

unread,
Jun 17, 2025, 6:18:46 AM6/17/25
to OpenVSP

Hi everyone,

I'm currently trying to compute the pitching moment (Xref=1.751, Yref=Zref=0) for a BWB (Blended Wing Body) configuration using both the Panel Method (PM) and the Vortex Lattice Method (VLM), but I'm getting completely opposite results from the two approaches (Mach=0.2, ReCref=70k).

With the PM, the configuration appears stable (negative CMy derivative) and trimmable (CMy crosses zero within an incidence range of 0° to 8°).
However, with the VLM, the configuration comes out as unstable (positive CMy derivative) and not trimmable.

I've attached the geometry file I'm using in case anyone wants to take a look (if it's necessary, I can attached also the custom airfoil files).

Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated—thank you in advance!

BWB_Baseline.vsp3

Li Zhikai

unread,
Jun 17, 2025, 9:45:10 AM6/17/25
to OpenVSP

According to my experience, calculating pitch moment is difficult for both methods and even for RANS. The result means that the precision of Cp is not enough to calculate Cm precisely. I've calculated flying wing's Cm and have met the same problem. At last I did some flights... The tendency is the same as VLM method's result, but I don't know if the tendency is the same for your case.

Mike Novikov

unread,
Jun 18, 2025, 12:29:22 AM6/18/25
to OpenVSP
Based on my experience, VLM in VSPAero correlates well with XFLR5 software (using the VLM method as well) in terms of pitching moment. 
I hope it will help you.

вторник, 17 июня 2025 г. в 17:45:10 UTC+4, Li Zhikai:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages