--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenVSP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openvsp+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openvsp/a85da9ac-ab54-4e0e-9fc6-bdbaf3413f46n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openvsp/CAEppYpGPpb_jQUz1PSfBuEL_JAo%3DC95o3mm09Gi%3DacgF85WNfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openvsp/CAPKZHbU7B4n0qL2NYOsL2u4Fo11HGVhr0OeQ%3DS3L2BDH%2B3G1aQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hello Erik, happy new year.I have tried to understand your method of creating flaps while waiting for more comprehensive and elegant way for modeling control surfaces ( ailerons, rudder etc.. )I am in little project which uses PMARC14, and while experimenting with PMARC14 geometry modeling I came across one of your article with picture depicted below.I have found and downloaded your model from HANGAR ( File # 415 ) since picture looks like VSP output in CFD stl format as half mesh, I tried to replicate.Unfortunately VSP ( 3.25 & 3.26 ) crashed while executing.From your published papers I have concluded that your piece of software HOrDE was used at some point but I could not figure where and how.Some times ago I have with NASA permission obtained a copy oh HOrDE but even with your assistance I was not able to even launch it.Now, at this point of time I am interested only to steps needed to create CFD stl file of half mesh of EET AR=12 ( your model # 415) obviously there is something that I could not figure out all by myself. I tried many time using different configuration but always VSP crashed.So It will be much appreciated if you could outline steps you have taken to generate mentioned.I believe that entire VSP community will applaud to such info.CheersMiroOn Thursday, December 23, 2021, 11:20:16 AM EST, 'Erik Olson' via OpenVSP <ope...@googlegroups.com> wrote:Jeremy,I don't think VLM properly models the physics of the slot airflow so there's no point in trying to separate the wing and flap surfaces. IMO the best way to model fowler flaps in VLM is to increase the chord of the wing to account for the flap chord extension. You do have to apply a "lift effectiveness" factor or you'll overpredict the lift augmentation. I wrote a paper that discusses the process in detail. If you go this route you don't have to make separate VSP models for the clean and high lift configurations; you can create both wing components and assign them to sets.Separating the wing and flap components like in the paper Rob cited is appropriate if you're using a higher-order method such as a panel code or Euler (see this paper). There's a model in the VSP Hangar that implements the geometry modeling process I described in the paper. It includes the custom "Flap Track" component that can be used to specify the translation of the flap.Erik

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openvsp/1428163334.1233956.1641247319088%40mail.yahoo.com.
