Completely different results for CMy after switching to 3.45.4

55 views
Skip to first unread message

Kilian

unread,
Sep 5, 2025, 8:39:22 AM (5 days ago) Sep 5
to OpenVSP
Hi everyone!

I am currently considering upgrading my OpenVSP workflow to the newest version 3.45.4 since I use the VSPAERO solver a lot.
Setting up a test case, I found that my results for CMy differ greatly. In fact, while VSP 3.44.5 gives me a stable aircraft (negative CMy slope), VSP 3.45.4 gives me an unstable aircraft with a positive slope for CMy.

I use VLM for 3.44.5 and only thin surfaces for 3.45.4. The settings are exactly the same. This is not allowed to happen, right? What could be the reason?

Will attach screenshots.

Kilian

unread,
Sep 5, 2025, 8:42:02 AM (5 days ago) Sep 5
to OpenVSP
This is OpenVSP 3.44.5:
cmy_vlm_vsp3.44.5.PNG


This is OpenVSP 3.45.4:
cmy_onlythin_vsp3.45.4.PNG

Zach Hazen

unread,
Sep 5, 2025, 2:40:28 PM (4 days ago) Sep 5
to OpenVSP
And I trust you double checked your moment reference location?  Can you trace the moment disparity to pressures using the viewer?  Do the meshes look very different?

Kilian

unread,
Sep 8, 2025, 3:16:19 AM (yesterday) Sep 8
to OpenVSP
The meshes only differ at the intersections. The results change when changing the tessellation. However, I want to run a grid convergence study and I noticed those weird results shown above when running a rather coarse grid.

Rob McDonald

unread,
Sep 8, 2025, 11:26:11 AM (yesterday) Sep 8
to OpenVSP
Can you provide a simplified test case that exhibits the change you're seeing?

Rob
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages