Here are links to my
presentation and
recording from the
2021 OpenVSP Workshop regarding Trimming with Negative Components.
There is not currently any development track to make modeling these features easier in VSP. I'm generally able to trick VSP into doing what I want because I'm very familiar with the capabilities and functions but that doesn't mean it's the right way to go about the process. I think at the time of the workshop Rob equated some of these to David Letterman's "Stupid Pet Tricks". Just because you CAN do something in OpenVSP doesn't mean that you SHOULD. For detailed features like this, CAD is really the better way to go. Ducted or buried inlets are model features that aren't really meant for the analyses in VSP because VSPAERO specifically is an inviscid, potential code albeit with some viscous correction and stall modeling. For these you're likely looking at mid- to high-fidelity CFD to capture what's really going on. If you don't have access to CAD and still need to make something approximate for your gridding and CFD tools, then as I said VSP can do a good job of approximating the surfaces. But, no, it won't be easy.
As for adding things to VSP, new features almost always come directly from funded work under NASA, DoD, or Industry contracts where a clear desire for certain capabilities is expressed. It takes a LOT of work to add capabilities or features that may seem relatively simple at first glance. Sometimes, just because he is nice, Rob will add or improve features in VSP on his own free time but that is understandably limited.
My recommendation is to spend some time working on the model to see what works and what doesn't. Try cutting material away with Negative Volume and see if you can't get something that looks right. I've included an image of the geometry I made this morning before work to give you an idea of how I modeled it.