On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 05:38 -0700, MikeN wrote:
> If I understand it, the bridge way elevation slope override algorithm
> should have been modified to draw a straight line between the
> endpoints (the ends of this bridge are at slightly different
> elevations).
> It is way 45091886
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/45091886
>
> I could not find any messages "Unexpectedly missing elevation for edge
> TurnEdge" for this way or the adjoining ways during the graph build.
> It's as though I didn't have the right syntax to make the
> slopeOverrides active.
>
> I have attached the elevation profile produced by the walk -
OK, I finally got a chance to look into this. It is indeed drawing a
straight line between the endpoints. Unfortunately, the left endpoint
is at a much lower elevation than the right. Basically, the underlying
ground dips slightly before the bridge starts. Weirdly, it also seems to
be lower after the bridge ends, if the Bing satellite photos are to be
believed, but maybe the NED sample for that location is taken on the
higher ground. I just adjusted the OSM so that the bridge starts a bit
earlier, which seems to fix the problem.