Dear colleagues,
Today a paper by >20 biochemical thermodynamics and myself came out with recommendations of the use of a 'reference metabolic potential' to replace the reference chemical potential in biochemistry. It is a much further extension of the apparent chemical potential defined by Alberty (and Athel, Bob, Keith and myself).
The reference metabolic potential corresponds to the reference Gibbs energy of formation from standard metabolic precursors at reference concentrations that make sense for (intracellular biochemistry).
This has a number of advantages, for instance meaningful metabolic landscapes, and positive metabolic potentials rather than the negative chemical potentials.
The metabolic potentials should be closer to the world view of the average biochemist ()and thereby more intuitive), i.e. to intracellular conditions, which are pretty similar across the biosphere of this planet.
It also suggests that there may be optimal standard conditions for kinetics and thermodynamics, but this may require more debate.
I attach the paper.
It may have some relevance for the openTECR group, so let me know if you are interested.
-- With kind regards
Hans V. Westerhoff