You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
Why don't use the Arduino Pro Mini instead of Arduino Mega. It is much cheaper! The best would be use the 3,3V version so I could connect the inexpensive Nokia LCD display.
If the microprocessor of Arduino Pro Mini is too slow, why don't use a Rasberry Pi, the price is almost the same of Mega, and you already have microsd reader and LAN., And also you could use LinuxCNC and a PC Monitor.
Instead of A4988 why don't use the DRV8825, that for almost the same price, manage more current?
Turnkey
unread,
May 24, 2015, 11:36:18 PM5/24/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
I suspect it's due to all the firmware (Marlin) that has been written in C to run on Arduino which probably wouldn't be compatible with RasPi without extensive rewriting. Granted the Mega is a little slow, I wish I was able to raster faster but it does the job for me as a hobbyist laser cutter/engraver.
Marlin was originally written for 3D printers, and those didn't need much computer processing power to run.
irresistiblecam
unread,
May 25, 2015, 5:56:40 AM5/25/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
If Arduino Mega is slow then the arduino pro mini is not to keep in consideration.
I am newbe, but I think that if you use Raspberry you don't need Marlin firmware, just because already a good opensource software that read g-code. The only thing to do is to configure it, for raspberry and for k40 laser, so you can manage the power of the k40 laser with gcode, maybe different in the same file.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
Looks like the same speed as we can do on the mega.
John Dickinson
unread,
May 26, 2015, 4:08:33 PM5/26/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
You can't use the Raspi with the normal OS because the kernel will not support real time and that is needed for accurate stepper motor control. If you want to do it with a Raspi then all of the OS will need to be written with that in mind as it is with Marlin for the Arduino. It is also much more expensive. You can buy the Marlin compatible board with driver board, stepper drivers and LCD for around £20, the Raspi alone is more than that.
John Dickinson
unread,
May 26, 2015, 6:17:58 PM5/26/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
The 2560 will go faster than the K40 can handle, a lot faster. You run out of laser power and mechanical ability long before you reach maximum speed on the Arduino.
irresistiblecam
unread,
May 29, 2015, 7:22:24 AM5/29/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
Good. So i declined the idea about Raspberry/odroid
What about to use Arduino Pro Mini instead of Arduino Mega?
What is the speed difference?
With arduino Pro mini, do you run out of laser power and mechanical ability long before you reach maximum speed on the Arduino Pro mini?
Turnkey
unread,
May 30, 2015, 5:03:06 AM5/30/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
I find with the mega I can run rasters at around 4500 mm per minute feed rate reliably, and up to 5500 mm per minute where it develops some strange artifacts at the left and right sides of the burn where the laser head is decelerating. Though that last issue may be code related.
What I have found though is there is a limit in the current setup in how much data I can send the system for rastering and have it burn it without running out of buffered data or similar. Not really a big issue since 4500 is still pretty damn fast for most things and we're talking about a machine that costs sub $600 all up to build.
For vector cuts the above isn't an issue at all, it's just rastering that could be optimised in the future.
irresistiblecam
unread,
May 31, 2015, 8:53:40 PM5/31/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
Thank you for your infos.
But what about my question?
John Dickinson
unread,
Jun 3, 2015, 2:25:47 PM6/3/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
If no one here has ever used one then you are going to have to get paper, pencil and calculator and then you can work out how fast it can cope with.
Chad Davis
unread,
Jul 16, 2015, 9:48:13 PM7/16/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to opensour...@googlegroups.com
GRBL was created for an Uno and took a good bit of engineering to pull off. A pro mini has half the flash and half the SRAM of the Uno. Doubt someone will take on that even greater challenge to save just a few dollars and a few square inches.