Yeah, I think something separate from buildlogs and hackerspaces could be useful. Those are very helpful, but they tend to be quite specific. Basically, I'd like to have a place where all the various software, components and suppliers thereof could be documented and, perhaps, rated by users.
Agree that keeping track of the software forks is a challenge, but that's kind of the nature of forking. It doesn't make sense to rename every fork, yet at some point you've made enough changes that you need to do so, especially if you aren't getting them pulled back upstream.