http://www.apa.org/monitor/2013/02/results.aspx
Prominent discussion of the project.
The only item I have been unsuccessful in altering is the journalistic
desire to credit a singular (me) for a community project. It at least
mentions that this is a large collaborative effort, but for "Nosek's
Reproducibility Project." Apologies for that. I am trying each time
to suggest that journalists talk to more than one of us, and perhaps
we can find additional ways to make sure the credit is more balanced.
There is another story that should appear soon in Pacific Standard
magazine. I haven't seen it, but I think that journalist spoke with a
half-dozen or so folks on the project. Also, I believe that the
journalist for the The Economist (also coming soon) chatted with a few
and might have even visited Roger's lab to observe a replication in
progress? Wired had been working on a story. I heard it was delayed,
but don't have any other updates.
More on Reproducibility Project updates coming soon...