community and governance; and eliminating cultural and >> linguistic biases in OpenRefine. >> >> OpenRefine's advisory committee is currently collecting

health of governance specifically for contributors). - After that, then the roadmap and aligning perhaps some milestones (or setting them). Or at least update and refine a roadmap

The draft governance and the first comments are available here https://github.com/OpenRefine/OpenRefine/pull/3198 On Fri., Jan. 22, 2021, 2:56 pm Tom Morris, wrote: > I'

improving our governance. Where Martin also has done updates on the Governance.md The release criteria is a small part of that (which roles should/can do a release, the criteria, etc

> > governance in OpenRefine Organisation which would clearly highlight > > what roles we have like Org Member, Contributor, Maintainer and Admin. > > > >

> > governance in OpenRefine Organisation which would clearly highlight > > what roles we have like Org Member, Contributor, Maintainer and Admin. > > > >

. The Governance is most important however, so thanks for putting effort into that and looking forward to reviewing it! I guess you have a good point about direct payments to CS&S

our own GOVERNANCE.md regardless of whether we join CS&S or not. > >>>> > >>>> My general feeling about these things is that it's good not

@Antonin : Twitter takes time to create the archives, and sometimes forgets to send the link to the file ... it will go faster with Twint : pip3

trust, governance, > > high profile. Founder and committers to Apache projects write them in > > their CVs. > > > > Company announce contributions to apache

open source governance and plenty of networking opportunity with > people who lead open source community (BSD > , > OpenJDK ). You can even > pitch OpenRefine to a room full

Defining a Governance model for OpenRefine To: Thad Guidry Cc: David Huynh , Iain Sproat , Tom Morris Tom, Here are the two discussion regarding pending architecture I was referring

master/governance.md > I thought that working with Pull Request and github comment will make the > discussion easier vs a wiki > I think at this point the organization is too

a draft governance model currently under review to determine how we made decision as a group -- hope to see you joining the project On Apr 15, 2015 10:58 AM, "Thad Guidry" wrote

have more governance like this. > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Antonin Delpeuch (lists) < > lists@antonin.delpeuch.eu> wrote: > >> Thanks Thad! >

regarding the governance of the project made public on the discussion list in a transparent fashion. PS I think the dev group of OpenRefine is more around 10 - 20 people including people

I just saw this tweet: https://twitter.com/OpenRefine/status/509371957071327232 and was disappointed

> and governance model >>> have >>> been proposed with little feedback from the community. >>> >>> Looking back at it, I think I might have

a clear governance model in order to have new project committers - using bounty source to incite developers. I've just published a new blog entry on OpenRefine blog . It is a call

Hello team, I have started a OpenRefine fund for work on bugs, features, etc. (I decided to flow my