Scenario Damage Using user defined

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

Hi 

I am running an analysis on Scenario Damage Using user defined data. I developed the fragility functions but using 5 damage states(by adding one extra damage state). But when i run the analysis on OQ i get an error (openquake.baselib.InvalidFile: node poes: expected 101, found 90, line 12 of C:\Users\omais\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpja1b97pg\calc_210\SCENARIO\fragility_model_PGA.xml).

I request to figure this error out!

Thank You

[Vitor Silva]

Can you please share your fragility xml file? Vitor

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenQuake Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openquake-use...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/88352920-6c60-4395-a19b-ef8e21e4da1bn%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

Here is the fragility file.

[Vitor Silva]

You have a formatting issue on your file. For the last damage state, you are missing a “</poes>” at the end (so after the last probability of exceeding of the last damage state).

 

You also have ids for the different functions like: UR_1961-1970&#xD;&#xA; This also seems to be a formatting issue, unless in your exposure model you have exacty these codes.

 

Best regards,

Vitor Silva

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/0c5bc900-d09b-4ebf-91e0-2108f9effc61n%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

I corrected the issue of poes but its still showing the same. Also regarding the taxonmy i have done the mapping for different structures that same fragility function which based upon the year of construction of masonry and for RC its based upon the height. I have attached all the files. Can u please take a look. That will be your most kindness.

[Vitor Silva]

Dear Omais,

 

It should have not be exactly the same error (please verify that the corrected fragility model is being used), but you should still have an error related to the mapping scheme. You do not have exactlt same fragility classes in the mapping scheme file and the fragility model file. For example, in the mapping scheme file you have “MUR_1919”, but then on the fragility file you have “MUR-1919;”. You need to have a perfect match between all classes.

 

Best,

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/265a65ab-6ce2-4d3e-b6c4-9690ec72131an%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

I have corrected the peos thing. Finally im getting an error like ( openquake.baselib.InvalidFile: node poes: expected heavy, found heavy , line 27 of C:\Users\omais\AppData\Local\Temp\tmp09fz11ft\calc_215\SCENARIO\fragility_model_PGA.xml). The damage state i added is heavy.

[Vitor Silva]

In line 27, as written on the error message, you have “expected_heavy”, and not “heavy”.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/946f01ee-d0ad-4f56-831b-4dd4d6d2defen%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

As i have a single fragility function for different taxonomies depending on age and height of the building and i did the mapping as shown below. But i keep getting  openquake.baselib.InvalidFile: C:\Users\omais\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpp_adiw6i\calc_218\SCENARIO\taxonomy_mapping.csv: the weights do not sum up to 1 for MUR/LWAL+CDN/H:2/YBET:1981,1990)

I dont understand why?

[Vitor Silva]

The mapping scheme should include only one instance of each building class in the exposure model.

 

If you have 5 building classes in the exposure model, you need to have at least 5 rows in the mapping scheme file. If you have just one fragility functions, then all building classes must be mapped to that fragility functions. For example:

 

taxonomy	conversion	weight
building_class_a	fragility_functions_1	1
building_class_b	fragility_functions_1	1
building_class_c	fragility_functions_1	1
building_class_d	fragility_functions_1	1
building_class_e	fragility_functions_1	1

 

Best,

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/13567592-44eb-46b7-8bec-7e8b0d624e65n%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

Thank You for the clarification. I did it. But I am now getting an error   (The exposure contains the taxonomy strings {'CR_H3', 'MUR_2005', 'MUR_1981-1990', 'MUR_1946-1960', 'CR_H4', 'MUR_1971-1980', 'MUR_1991-2000', 'MUR_1961-1970', 'MUR_1919-1945', 'MUR_2001-2005', 'MUR_1919'} which are not in the fragility/vulnerability/consequence model)

The taxonomy strings actually are in the fragility model but it keeps showing it again and again. i have shard my final zip file. Can u please check why it is now running? That will be your most kindness

[Vitor Silva]

Dear Omais,

 

In your fragility file you have strings such as MUR_1981-1990; and not MUR_1981-1990 (you have an “;” in each id).

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/aa87c1c9-23c5-4b81-b442-6895797927d1n%40googlegroups.com.

[OMAIS UL MEHRAJ]

Yes i corrected it but still showing some error in export in gmf's. I tried to look for it but everYthing seems to be correct?