It’s impossible to answer without seeing the input.
Hi AllI am trying to run for CMS and I get this result why? Anybody has any idea?Thanks--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenQuake Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to openquake-use...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/ecbb6af2-4a6a-4440-b594-7844e8f65091n%40googlegroups.com.
The only thing I am spotting in the .ini file is that you have an investigation time of 50 years, and a small probability of exceedance
Hi MarcoPlease see the attachedThanks
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/c278fa65-98d0-4cfd-b4b4-b3752a750436n%40googlegroups.com.
Thanks. I am currently too busy to work on this. Please try to adjust your ini file to have a more sensible probability of exceedance.
Hi MaroPlease see the inputs I use for the modelling, there are two source models, other one is more than 24MB and I cannot upload here, it is a smooth modeland both source models include three different tectonic settings,
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/eabf9eb8-ed5a-41be-9e21-141f9a443860n%40googlegroups.com.
I suggest you try to run an analysis for a higher probability of exceedance.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/24551d8a-59e2-4fea-9906-43dd02a92bb1n%40googlegroups.com.
Since you are having problems, I suggest trying shorter RPs. Note that, ideally, for a dam, it would be advisable to incorporate potentially nearby structures.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/openquake-users/2f64f0ef-c045-4ec6-b337-45a2b872db3an%40googlegroups.com.
Hi
I wasn’t able to share the real data as it contains confidential information, so I’ve uploaded sample source models instead.
Would it be possible to have your email address so I can send you the actual input files directly? The computed UHS looks logical and makes sense, but I’d like to perform a Conditional Mean Spectrum (CMS) analysis as well.
Thanks